Fiber-payjoin-kit: alignment with Fiber roadmap on collaborative privacy primitives #1377
Unanswered
Ile-Labs-T
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
|
Hi @chenyukang @quake @contrun and Fiber contributors — following up on this thread about fiber-payjoin-kit (PoC and architecture doc here: <link>). Can someone confirm whether collaborative channel-funding/privacy primitives fit Fiber’s current roadmap, or point us to the right contact/committee for a review? Thanks — @Ile-Labs-T |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi Fiber team,
ILE Labs is working on fiber-payjoin-kit, a collaborative Payjoin-style privacy primitive for the CKB Fiber Network.
Before we continue deeper into implementation, we want to confirm that this direction aligns with the current Fiber roadmap, especially around privacy updates and channel-funding flows.
We are not trying to reinvent existing work. Our goal is to adapt collaborative funding concepts to CKB’s Cell model in a way that fits naturally with Fiber.
Could you please confirm whether this should move forward as a direct Fiber integration, an SDK extension, or another compatibility path?
Thank you.
All reactions