MeansImplicitUse for NetDaemonAppAttribute

[Juulsn]

Proposed change

Adds the JetBrains MeansImplicitUse to the NetDaemonAppAttribute.
Helps R# and Rider to mark classes as used if the NetDeamonAppAttribute is used

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
• This PR is related to issue:
• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the [development checklist][dev-checklist]
• The code compiles without warnings (code quality chek)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

[FrankBakkerNl]

I like this idea, If I am correct there is a similar attributes in a MS namespace somewhere, that should probably work with both jet brains ans MS IDE and we would not have to reference JB packages

[helto4real]

Thank you for the contribution. I am reluctant to add this into the core since it is dependent on specific IDE:s. Is this possible to add as an Extension instead. I know the attribute class is sealed so I cannot see a good solution to it right now. @FrankBakkerNl ?

[Juulsn]

I've added the needed code directly as an internal class as stated on this site: https://blog.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2018/05/03/what-are-jetbrains-annotations/

So we can get rid of the nuget dependency.

@FrankBakkerNl I couldn't find anything similar in the MS namespace. JetBrains normally provides info about such attributes. For example the PureAttribute: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/resharper/Reference__Code_Annotation_Attributes.html#PureAttribute

[FrankBakkerNl]

This is nice indeed, now Rider will no longer show my app classes in gray :-)
Because the jetbrains code is now included as internal, I don't see a problem like this, how about you @helto4real ?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.25 ⚠️

Comparison is base (254c154) 80.93% compared to head (342d07b) 80.68%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #852      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.93%   80.68%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files         160      161       +1     
  Lines        4127     4137      +10     
  Branches      410      410              
==========================================
- Hits         3340     3338       -2     
- Misses        625      636      +11     
- Partials      162      163       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	80.68% <0.00%> (-0.25%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...odel/Common/Attributes/JetBrainsCodeAnnotations.cs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ppModel/Common/Attributes/NetDaemonAppAttribute.cs	100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[helto4real]

This is nice indeed, now Rider will no longer show my app classes in gray :-) Because the jetbrains code is now included as internal, I don't see a problem like this, how about you @helto4real ?

Yea this is much better solution. I accept that. Good solution. Thanks!