Skip to content

docs: stack components matrix + de-numbered troubleshooting on enterprise getting-started#809

Merged
SunsetDrifter merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs/enterprise-getting-started-stack-components
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

docs: stack components matrix + de-numbered troubleshooting on enterprise getting-started#809
SunsetDrifter merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs/enterprise-getting-started-stack-components

Conversation

@SunsetDrifter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Two small content changes to the Enterprise Commercial getting-started page (src/pages/selfhosted/enterprise/getting-started.mdx):

  • Add a Stack components matrix (new ### 1.6) to the Fresh Installation section, so readers validating the install have a reference for the containers the script deploys. One matrix for the combined stack (caddy, dashboard, postgres, netbird-server) and a separate one for the optional traffic-flow services (nats, receiver, enricher). Scoped to the combined topology, since getting-started.sh only produces that.
  • Drop the 4.x numbering from the eight Troubleshooting subheadings. Sections 1–3 are sequential procedures where numbers signal order; Troubleshooting is a lookup list of independent symptoms where numbering falsely implies a sequence. ## 4. Troubleshooting and sections 1–3 keep their numbering.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@bcmmbaga, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 1 minute and 5 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 528169a8-cd9d-40e8-afae-2030c8985131

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b4aa80 and 85a3ff3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/pages/selfhosted/enterprise/getting-started.mdx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/enterprise-getting-started-stack-components

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@bcmmbaga bcmmbaga marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2026 14:50
@braginini braginini self-requested a review June 24, 2026 15:15
@SunsetDrifter SunsetDrifter merged commit e21d6da into main Jun 24, 2026
3 checks passed
@SunsetDrifter SunsetDrifter deleted the docs/enterprise-getting-started-stack-components branch June 24, 2026 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants