-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
feat: add a verbose flag
#3934
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
feat: add a verbose flag
#3934
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ | ||
| 'use strict' | ||
|
|
||
| const { log } = require('../logger') | ||
|
|
||
| const logVerbose = function (logs, verbose, message) { | ||
| if (!verbose) { | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| log(logs, message) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const logSendingEventToChild = function (logs, verbose) { | ||
| logVerbose(logs, verbose, 'Step starting.') | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const logSentEventToChild = function (logs, verbose) { | ||
| logVerbose(logs, verbose, 'Step started.') | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const logPluginMethodStart = function (verbose) { | ||
| logVerbose(undefined, verbose, 'Plugin logic started.') | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const logPluginMethodEnd = function (verbose) { | ||
| logVerbose(undefined, verbose, 'Plugin logic ended.') | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const logSendingEventToParent = function (verbose, error) { | ||
| const message = error instanceof Error ? `Step erroring.\n${error.stack}` : 'Stop closing.' | ||
| logVerbose(undefined, verbose, message) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const logReceivedEventFromChild = function (logs, verbose) { | ||
| logVerbose(logs, verbose, 'Step ended.') | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const logStepCompleted = function (logs, verbose) { | ||
| logVerbose(logs, verbose, 'Step completed.') | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| module.exports = { | ||
| logSendingEventToChild, | ||
| logSentEventToChild, | ||
| logPluginMethodStart, | ||
| logPluginMethodEnd, | ||
| logSendingEventToParent, | ||
| logReceivedEventFromChild, | ||
| logStepCompleted, | ||
| } | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given the need for this ASAP I'm ok with the flag, but what do you think of having debug levels in the future? It would be more suited IMO vs these flags which can be confusing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I was thinking this should be the next step as well!
Note than from a user standpoint, they use the
NETLIFY_BUILD_DEBUGenvironment variable for bothdebugandverbose, so there's currently a single level from their perspective. The buildbot and CLI do not pass theverboseflag, so the only difference is for the tests, which setsverboseasfalseanddebugastrue.