Skip to content

Conversation

@jmalak
Copy link
Contributor

@jmalak jmalak commented Oct 5, 2025

No description provided.

@hpax
Copy link
Member

hpax commented Oct 6, 2025

OpenWatcom still hasn't fixed its switch handling?!

@jmalak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmalak commented Oct 7, 2025

Yes, Open Watcom has not yet solved this problem.
We will fix it.
If you remove OW hack then only latest OW 2.0 can be used to build nasm because all previous versions of WATCOM and Open Watcom compilers has this problem.
If you want support OW 2.0 only then we can remove most of WATCOM hacks, because OW 2.0 is more C99 compliant and also POSIX support is improved, but it remove support for all older WATCOM and Open Watcom versions.
Now I test build it only with OW 1.9 and OW 2.0 on Linux and Windows hosts for all targets.

@jmalak jmalak force-pushed the fix-4 branch 4 times, most recently from 3b5241e to 05dc880 Compare October 8, 2025 07:11
@hpax
Copy link
Member

hpax commented Oct 10, 2025

Duplicated in #122 (merged)

@hpax hpax closed this Oct 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants