Fix backslash escaping in Privilege Secure RDS Web App Launcher article

[zoeycastillo]

Corrected markdown syntax to properly display escaped backslashes in the warning message about app secret configuration.

[claude]

Pull Request Review

Summary

This PR fixes markdown syntax for displaying escaped backslashes in a warning message about app secret configuration in the Privilege Secure RDS Web App Launcher documentation.

✅ Positive Aspects

1. Clear Intent: The PR has a focused, single-purpose change that improves documentation clarity
2. Correct Fix: The markdown escaping is now properly implemented - displaying \\ requires \\\\ in the markdown source
3. Typo Correction: Fixed spelling error "preceeding" → "preceding"
4. Minimal Scope: Changes are limited to exactly what needs to be fixed, following the principle of minimal change

📋 Code Quality Assessment

Documentation Quality: ✅ Excellent

• The warning now correctly demonstrates that backslashes need escaping in the app secret
• The markdown rendering will properly show:
  • First pair: \\ (to show a backslash in the secret)
  • Second pair: \\\\ (to show what needs to be typed when escaping)

Best Practices: ✅ Followed

• Atomic commit addressing a single issue
• Clear PR description explaining the change
• No unnecessary formatting changes

🔍 Technical Analysis

Before:

Any backslashes (\\) in the app secret must be escaped with a preceeding backslash (\\\)

• Would render incorrectly, showing \ instead of \\ for the escaped version
• Typo: "preceeding"

After:

Any backslashes (\\) in the app secret must be escaped with a preceding backslash (\\\\)

• Correctly shows \\ for the input and \\\\ for the escaped version
• Fixed spelling

🎯 Verification

The change correctly addresses the markdown escaping issue:

• Input display: (\\) renders as a single backslash \ in the documentation
• Output display: (\\\\) renders as double backslash \\ in the documentation
• This accurately represents that users need to double their backslashes for escaping

🏁 Conclusion

Recommendation: ✅ APPROVE

This is a clean, focused documentation fix that:

• Corrects markdown rendering issues
• Fixes a spelling error
• Improves user clarity
• Follows documentation best practices

No issues found with:

• Security concerns: N/A (documentation only)
• Performance considerations: N/A (documentation only)
• Test coverage: N/A (documentation only)
• Breaking changes: None

The PR is ready to merge.

---

Review performed with attention to repository standards and documentation best practices.

[zoeycastillo]

Hey @pasanillege ! Apologies for the delay, I have updated the article with the correct syntax. The changes have been merged to dev and are in queue to be merged with main. Keep an eye on the article to ensure the changes have been replicated. Let me know if you have any questions, thank you!