Skip to content

Tech writer#420

Merged
jth-nw merged 7 commits intodevfrom
tech-writer
Mar 9, 2026
Merged

Tech writer#420
jth-nw merged 7 commits intodevfrom
tech-writer

Conversation

@jth-nw
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jth-nw jth-nw commented Mar 9, 2026

No description provided.

Comment on lines +29 to +35
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
fetch-depth: 1

- name: Fetch base commit for diff

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Checkout of untrusted code in trusted context High

Potential execution of untrusted code on a privileged workflow (
issue_comment
)

- name: Run doc-pr review
if: steps.changed-files.outputs.count > 0
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action in workflow Medium

Unpinned 3rd party Action 'Doc PR Review' step
Uses Step
uses 'anthropics/claude-code-action' with ref 'v1', not a pinned commit hash
Move base_branch comparison into the same step that sets it, using the
shell variable directly instead of re-interpolating via ${{ }}. This
prevents potential code injection from untrusted PR branch names.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Comment on lines +165 to +172
- name: Checkout repository
if: steps.pr-info.outputs.is_fork == 'false' && steps.pr-info.outputs.targets_dev == 'true'
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
ref: ${{ steps.pr-info.outputs.branch }}
fetch-depth: 0

- name: Install Vale

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Checkout of untrusted code in trusted context High

Potential execution of untrusted code on a privileged workflow (
issue_comment
)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Issues in PR changes

.claude/skills/dale/SKILL.md

Line 24: Grammar error - "ones" should be "once". The sentence should read "Mark each Todo as complete once you've checked the given file for that rule."


To apply suggested fixes to the updated documentation, individually or in bulk, comment @claude on this PR followed by your instructions (@claude fix all issues or @claude fix all linting issues or @claude fix only the spelling errors).

To review the updated documentation for preexisting issues, comment @claude on this PR followed by your instructions (@claude detect preexisting issues).

Note: Automated fixes are only available for branches in this repository, not forks.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Issues in PR changes

.claude/skills/dale/SKILL.md

Line 46: Missing trailing newline at end of file.


To apply suggested fixes to the updated documentation, individually or in bulk, comment @claude on this PR followed by your instructions (@claude fix all issues or @claude fix all linting issues or @claude fix only the spelling errors).

To review the updated documentation for preexisting issues, comment @claude on this PR followed by your instructions (@claude detect preexisting issues).

Note: Automated fixes are only available for branches in this repository, not forks.


- name: Handle @claude request
if: steps.pr-info.outputs.is_fork == 'false' && steps.pr-info.outputs.targets_dev == 'true'
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action in workflow Medium

Unpinned 3rd party Action 'Doc PR Review' step
Uses Step
uses 'anthropics/claude-code-action' with ref 'v1', not a pinned commit hash
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Issues in PR changes

Note: The user listed the following files for review, but they were NOT actually modified in this PR:

  • docs/accessanalyzer/11.6/solutions/filesystem/overview.md
  • docs/accessanalyzer/12.0/solutions/filesystem/overview.md
  • docs/auditor/10.7/configuration/fileservers/windows/ports.md
  • docs/auditor/10.7/configuration/logonactivity/ports.md
  • docs/auditor/10.8/configuration/azurefiles/overview.md
  • docs/auditor/10.8/configuration/fileservers/qumulo/overview.md
  • docs/auditor/10.8/configuration/fileservers/windows/ports.md
  • docs/auditor/10.8/configuration/logonactivity/ports.md
  • docs/auditor/10.8/configuration/overview.md
  • docs/kb/accessanalyzer/reference-and-technical-specifications/FileSystem-Permissions-Format-Reference.md
  • docs/kb/accessanalyzer/reference-and-technical-specifications/SharePoint-Permissions-Format-Reference.md
  • docs/kb/accessanalyzer/reference-and-technical-specifications/access-analyzer-event-log-ids.md
  • docs/kb/accessanalyzer/reference-and-technical-specifications/access-analyzer-version-numbers.md
  • docs/kb/accessanalyzer/reference-and-technical-specifications/net_dependencies_for_netwrix_access_analyzer.md
  • docs/kb/accessanalyzer/reference-and-technical-specifications/what-does-licensed-host-count-exceeded-mean-in-the-access-analyzer-banner.md
  • docs/passwordsecure/9.3/index.md

The following files were actually modified in PR 420 and have been reviewed.

docs/CLAUDE.md

Line 125: Passive voice violation. "Fork PRs cannot be pushed to" should use active voice and be clearer. Change to "Automated fixes cannot be pushed to fork PRs."

All other files reviewed (.claude/agents/.md, .claude/skills//SKILL.md, CLAUDE.md) have no issues.


To apply suggested fixes to the updated documentation, individually or in bulk, comment @claude on this PR followed by your instructions (@claude fix all issues or @claude fix all linting issues or @claude fix only the spelling errors).

To review the updated documentation for preexisting issues, comment @claude on this PR followed by your instructions (@claude detect preexisting issues).

Note: Automated fixes are only available for branches in this repository, not forks.

@jth-nw jth-nw merged commit d81685d into dev Mar 9, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@jth-nw jth-nw deleted the tech-writer branch March 16, 2026 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant