Skip to content

[Bug]: Need more info in PR requests -- due to AI-generated submissions #2014

@mjang

Description

@mjang

Describe the problem you have identified

I'm not opposed to AI generated PRs, in most cases.

  • Exception: I want to preserve "Good first issues" for humans
  • Question: do we want to preserve "Good first issues" for people who are just starting their journey with Git? (How do we define that?)

GPT suggests we add more questions to PR templates, such as:

Did you use AI assistance?
[ ] No
[ ] Yes

If yes:
- Which tool?
- What was generated?
- Did you verify accuracy?
- Did you review for licensing concerns?

Then add:

Required human review
Vale and markdown lint checks
Link checking
Documentation tests
Security review for code samples

Which product or products does this problem relate to?

Other

If necessary, explain any additional steps to reproduce the problem.

No response

What is the expected or desired behaviour?

No response

Is this problem specific to a particular platform or software version?

No response

Any additional information

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions