STY: Enforce more ruff rules #3437
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DimitriPapadopoulos
force-pushed
the
ruff
branch
from
b2950a0 to
4ebdbe8
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3437 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 73.68% 73.72% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 60 60
Lines 4758 4757 -1
Branches 616 615 -1
==========================================
+ Hits 3506 3507 +1
+ Misses 1110 1109 -1
+ Partials 142 141 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
DimitriPapadopoulos
force-pushed
the
ruff
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a2203d7 to
8a10343
Compare
effigies
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2025
DimitriPapadopoulos
force-pushed
the
ruff
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c36db09 to
b8cc14e
Compare
Member
|
Marking as draft to make quickly reviewing the PR list simpler. Please do not hesitate to mark ready for review when you think it's ready. This PR is out of date. |
FLY002 Consider f-string instead of string join
PERF403 Use a dictionary comprehension instead of a for-loop
PGH003 Use specific rule codes when ignoring type issues
PLE1205 Too many arguments for `logging` format string
RUF010 Use explicit conversion flag
RUF013 PEP 484 prohibits implicit `Optional`
RUF021 Parenthesize `a and b` expressions when chaining `and` and `or` together, to make the precedence clear
RUF100 Unused `noqa` directive
F841 Local variable is assigned to but never used
FURB192 Prefer `max` over `sorted()` to compute the maximum value in a sequence
RUF028 This suppression comment is invalid because it cannot be in an expression, pattern, argument list, or other non-statement
RUF039 First argument is not raw string
DimitriPapadopoulos
force-pushed
the
ruff
branch
from
b8cc14e to
fe0986c
Compare
DimitriPapadopoulos
force-pushed
the
ruff
branch
from
fe0986c to
91c89cc
Compare
effigies
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.