feat: Write WARC-Date with up to nanosecond precision#83
Merged
Conversation
This commit increases the precision of the WARC-Date field for WARC 1.1 records up to 9 decimal fractions of a second (nanosecond) . In practice the clock resolution of unix systems is ~1ms and ~0.5ms for windows systems. WARC 1.0 records will be written with second precision as was the case for all records written with this library until now. The WARC 1.1 specification says the WARC-Date field may be specified in any levels of granularity according to the [W3CDTF]. It also says WARC-Date should be specified with as much precision as is accurately known. See https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/#warc-date-mandatory See https://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime See https://pkg.go.dev/time#hdr-Timer_Resolution
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.