Nc test/keyboard shortcuts

[dstala]

Change Summary

Provide summary of changes with issue number if any.

Change type

• feat: (new feature for the user, not a new feature for build script)
• fix: (bug fix for the user, not a fix to a build script)
• docs: (changes to the documentation)
• style: (formatting, missing semi colons, etc; no production code change)
• refactor: (refactoring production code, eg. renaming a variable)
• test: (adding missing tests, refactoring tests; no production code change)
• chore: (updating grunt tasks etc; no production code change)

Test/ Verification

Provide summary of changes.

Additional information / screenshots (optional)

Anything for maintainers to be made aware of

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Playwright test suite. Specifically, one test for verifying keyboard shortcuts has been marked as skipped, while several new tests have been added to enhance coverage for form view functionalities. These new tests include validations for field reordering, form element validation, conditional fields, and attachment functionalities, ensuring robust testing of various user interactions and validation rules.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
tests/playwright/tests/db/features/keyboardShortcuts.spec.ts	Test case modified from test('Verify shortcuts', ...) to test.skip('Verify shortcuts', ...).
tests/playwright/tests/db/views/viewForm.spec.ts	Added multiple new tests for field reordering, form element validation, conditional fields, and attachments.

Suggested labels

size:S, lgtm

Suggested reviewers

• rameshmane7218

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)

tests/playwright/tests/db/views/viewForm.spec.ts (3)

Line range hint 708-878: Avoid redefining the 'createTable' function within the same file

The function createTable is defined multiple times within the same file (approximately lines 708-878 and 1092-1275). Redefining functions in the same scope can lead to conflicts and potential errors. Consider renaming these functions or consolidating them into a single function to improve code clarity and maintainability.

Also applies to: 1092-1275

---

Line range hint 200-1500: Replace fixed timeouts with explicit waits for improved test reliability

There are multiple instances of await dashboard.rootPage.waitForTimeout(...) throughout the test code. Relying on fixed timeouts can make tests flaky and unreliable because they may not wait appropriately for asynchronous events. Instead, use explicit waits or conditions to ensure the test proceeds only after the necessary conditions are met.

Example:

- await dashboard.rootPage.waitForTimeout(2000);
+ await dashboard.rootPage.waitForSelector('selector_for_element');

---

980-980: Consider optimizing the test instead of marking it as slow

At line 980, test.slow(); is used to indicate that the test is expected to run slowly. It would be beneficial to investigate and optimize the test to reduce its execution time, enhancing the overall efficiency of the test suite.

tests/playwright/tests/db/features/keyboardShortcuts.spec.ts (1)

53-53: Provide a reason for skipping the test

The test Verify shortcuts has been marked as skipped using test.skip() at line 53. To maintain clarity and assist future maintainers, please consider adding a comment explaining why this test is being skipped.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6297cfc and 71b9e03.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• tests/playwright/tests/db/features/keyboardShortcuts.spec.ts (1 hunks)
• tests/playwright/tests/db/views/viewForm.spec.ts (1 hunks)