Experiment with `typescript-go` instead of `@swc/wasm-typescript`

[trivikr]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Not a problem, but TypeScript team just announced today (Tue, March 11) that they're going to port TypeScript to Native, and their port shows 10X improvement.

This module currently uses @swc/wasm-typescript, a WebAssembly port of the SWC TypeScript parser.
Switching to official TypeScript port might improve reliability, and possibly performance

Describe the solution you'd like

Evaluate migrating from @swc/wasm-typescript to typescript-go
Even if the experiment if unsuccessful, report the findings back to the project https://github.com/microsoft/typescript-go/issues?q=sort%3Aupdated-desc+is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen

[marco-ippolito]

No blank spacing so its not possible until that is supported. I don't think its worth trying

[marco-ippolito]

I created a feature request in typescript for this microsoft/TypeScript#61410

[JounQin]

Or why not use napi-rs as wrapper but WASM now?

[jirutka]

they're going to port TypeScript to Native, and their port shows 10X improvement.

This is irrelevant for amaro because it doesn’t use tsc. However, it would be interesting to compare performance of @swc/wasm-typescript with typescript-go. I bet the former will win.

[marco-ippolito]

We discussed about this with the team and it's not possible by design, we should keep using SWC for the foreseeable future.