fix(queries): allow complex types in type linking regex

[moshams272]

Description

Currently, doc-kit fails to parse and link complex JSDoc types that contain generics, unions and arrow functions.

This happens because the regex in src/utils/queries/index.mjs uses [^<({})>]+, which excludes <, >, (, and ). When the parser encounters these characters, it ignores the entire type block, leaving it unlinked and sometimes causing Markdown parsers (Remark) to see them as HTML tags.

This PR updates the regex exclusion list to [^{}]+.

Validation

Before:

After:

Related Issues

No related one.

Check List

• I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
• I have run node --run test and all tests passed.
• I have check code formatting with node --run format & node --run lint.
• I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
api-docs-tooling	Ready	Preview	May 31, 2026 8:08am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Small, targeted regex change in doc parsing with new unit tests; possible edge cases around nested {} but scope is limited to type reference matching.

Overview
Fixes JSDoc/API type detection and linking for generics, unions, and parenthesized types by relaxing two regexes in src/utils/queries/index.mjs: normalizeTypes and linksWithTypes now allow <, >, (, and ) inside a type span and only stop at {/} delimiters ([^{}]+ instead of [^<({})>]+).

Adds unit coverage for those patterns (basic types, Readonly<object>, Map<...>, (string|number), and linked generic/union forms). Release bump to 1.3.7 in package.json / lockfile.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 0179459. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.93%. Comparing base (bf76f97) to head (0179459).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #814      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.86%   82.93%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         171      171              
  Lines       14961    15016      +55     
  Branches     1313     1321       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits        12398    12453      +55     
  Misses       2554     2554              
  Partials        9        9              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[avivkeller]

Can you run npm version patch?

[AugustinMauroy]

LGMT ! is there are test for that ?

[moshams272]

LGMT ! is there are test for that ?

I initially relied only on screenshots to show it works, but u r right.