Add Japanese article documenting AGENTS.md creation with GitHub Copilot and practical workflow validation #3
Conversation
Co-authored-by: nqounet <1277337+nqounet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: nqounet <1277337+nqounet@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot 記事を作成する時に、5つのカスタムエージェントがどのように働くのかについて考察を追加してください。 |
…arnings Co-authored-by: nqounet <1277337+nqounet@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot お疲れ様でした。さらに改善点が見つかっていれば、AGENTS.mdを更新してください。 |
Co-authored-by: nqounet <1277337+nqounet@users.noreply.github.com>
記事作成の実践から得られた具体的な知見をもとに、AGENTS.md にさらなる改善を追加しました： エージェントの強化:
ワークフローの改善:
コミット: 0e97b77 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR creates a comprehensive Japanese blog article documenting the experience of using GitHub Copilot's agent panel to create AGENTS.md, while simultaneously enhancing AGENTS.md with practical learnings from that real-world application. The meta-documentation approach (using the defined workflow to document itself) provides valuable validation and iterative improvement of the article creation process.
Key Changes:
- New 297-line Japanese article detailing the AGENTS.md creation journey, PR #2 feedback, and practical validation of the 5-agent workflow
- Enhanced AGENTS.md with 90 new lines including iterative workflow patterns, localization guidance, alternative patterns (Self-Interview, Multi-Source), and a "Lessons Learned from Practice" section
- Refined agent definitions based on practical insights (narrative development for Content Strategist, concrete examples for Technical Writer, search tool for QA)
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
articles/creating-agents-md-with-github-copilot.md |
New Japanese article documenting the AGENTS.md creation experience, including detailed analysis of how each of the 5 agents worked during article creation and practical challenges discovered |
AGENTS.md |
Enhanced with practical learnings including iterative workflow for complex articles, alternative patterns, localization considerations, refined agent definitions, and comprehensive "Lessons Learned from Practice" section |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review for a chance to win a $100 gift card. Take the survey.
| ## 今後の展開 | ||
|
|
||
| この記事作成を通じて、AGENTS.mdの実践的な検証ができました。今後は： | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **エージェント定義の改善** | ||
| - SEO Optimizerを初期段階から関与させる手順の追加 | ||
| - QAフィードバックループの明示化 | ||
| - 日本語コンテンツ向けのガイドライン追加 | ||
|
|
||
| 2. **新しいパターンの追加** | ||
| - 「自己インタビュー」パターンの文書化 | ||
| - PRレビューをインタビュー素材として活用する方法 | ||
|
|
||
| 3. **ワークフローの最適化** | ||
| - 反復的なプロセスの設計 | ||
| - エージェント間の情報ハンドオフの仕組み | ||
| - チェックリストの作成 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The section "今後の展開" (Future Development) lists improvements as if they are planned for the future, but these improvements are already implemented in AGENTS.md in this same PR (Iterative Workflow section, Localization Considerations, Self-Interview Pattern, explicit handoff tips, etc.). Consider revising this section to clarify that these improvements have been implemented based on the learnings, rather than presenting them as future work. For example, the section could be titled "実装した改善" (Implemented Improvements) or the text could indicate "この学びを基に、AGENTS.mdに以下の改善を実装しました" (Based on these learnings, we implemented the following improvements to AGENTS.md).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
セクションタイトルを「今後の展開」から「実装した改善」に変更し、内容も書き直しました。すべての改善がこのPR内で既に実装済みであることを明確にしています。
コミット: 8a5f3f4
| ### 2. ツール配列の一貫性 | ||
|
|
||
| **指摘内容：** | ||
| QA Reviewerエージェントのみ `['read', 'edit']` を指定していましたが、他のエージェントは `['read', 'edit', 'search']` を指定していました。QAレビューでも検索機能が有用である可能性があります。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent agent naming. The agent is referred to as "Quality Assurance" in line 96 and line 232, but here it's called "QA Reviewer". For consistency with AGENTS.md (which uses "Quality Assurance Agent"), this should be "Quality Assurance" or "QA" instead of "QA Reviewer".
| QA Reviewerエージェントのみ `['read', 'edit']` を指定していましたが、他のエージェントは `['read', 'edit', 'search']` を指定していました。QAレビューでも検索機能が有用である可能性があります。 | |
| Quality Assurance Agentエージェントのみ `['read', 'edit']` を指定していましたが、他のエージェントは `['read', 'edit', 'search']` を指定していました。品質保証でも検索機能が有用である可能性があります。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
「QA Reviewer」を「Quality Assurance」に修正しました。AGENTS.mdの定義と一貫性を持たせています。
コミット: 8a5f3f4
|
@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
Co-authored-by: nqounet <1277337+nqounet@users.noreply.github.com>
レビューコメントに基づいて修正しました：
AGENTS.md は現在、実践から得られたすべての主要な知見を含んでおり、包括的な状態です。さらなる改善の必要性は見つかりませんでした。 コミット: 8a5f3f4 |
Creates a blog article (in Japanese) documenting the experience of using GitHub Copilot's agent panel to create AGENTS.md in a fresh repository, referencing PR #2. The article includes practical analysis of how the defined agents actually worked during article creation, and updates AGENTS.md with learnings from this real-world application.
Changes
New article:
articles/creating-agents-md-with-github-copilot.md(303 lines)Updated AGENTS.md: Enhanced with practical learnings (480 lines total, +90 lines)
Structure
Article follows the project's own workflow: written using the interview-based approach defined in AGENTS.md, then validates and improves that workflow through practical application. The iterative refinement of AGENTS.md demonstrates the continuous improvement cycle enabled by this workflow. The article clearly documents that all discovered improvements are already implemented in AGENTS.md within this same PR, demonstrating a complete experience → learning → implementation → documentation cycle.
Original prompt
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.