Skip to content

Conversation

@yangarbiter
Copy link
Collaborator

@yangarbiter yangarbiter commented Dec 19, 2016

#64

Still need some discussions on interface for multilabel models.

Things to check:

  • interface for multilabel model
  • the DummyCLF for resolving conditions of some label might have only one class in training set
  • test for multilabel model
  • whether to create libact.models.multiclass and libact.models.singleclass

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 19, 2016

Current coverage is 85.86% (diff: 89.38%)

Merging #74 into master will decrease coverage by 0.67%

@@             master        #74   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            21         24     +3   
  Lines           676        679     +3   
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
- Hits            585        583     -2   
- Misses           91         96     +5   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 2ef52ba...4701bd6

@iamyuanchung
Copy link
Collaborator

I think for the second issue, the problem is not about the design of interface but the algorithm itself - it's best for the algorithm to be capable of detecting new kinds of y \in {0, 1}^k.
I know for multi-label classification, there will be plenty of label combinations.
I will check how DummyCLF is working and comment more later.

@iamyuanchung
Copy link
Collaborator

For the last issue, what is the goal of libact.models.singleclass?

@yangarbiter yangarbiter merged commit 8d3e5a4 into master Jan 18, 2017
@yangarbiter yangarbiter deleted the multilabel branch January 18, 2017 06:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants