Skip to content

Conversation

@KeranYang
Copy link
Member

@KeranYang KeranYang commented May 3, 2025

Because Constants.SIDE_INPUT_DIR is exposed to user. Fixing failed example: https://github.com/numaproj/numaflow-java/actions/runs/14812238370/job/41588350230

…IDE_INPUT_DIR is exposed to user

Signed-off-by: Keran Yang <yangkr920208@gmail.com>
@KeranYang KeranYang marked this pull request as ready for review May 3, 2025 15:47
@KeranYang KeranYang requested review from vigith and yhl25 May 3, 2025 15:47
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@ec9b3bf). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #182   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   58.76%           
  Complexity      ?      476           
=======================================
  Files           ?      151           
  Lines           ?     3390           
  Branches        ?      231           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1992           
  Misses          ?     1231           
  Partials        ?      167           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@yhl25
Copy link
Contributor

yhl25 commented May 3, 2025

How will removing the private constructor fix the access issue?

.
Signed-off-by: Keran Yang <yangkr920208@gmail.com>
@KeranYang KeranYang changed the title fix: remove private constructor for sideinput Constant fix: revert sideinput Constant back to public May 3, 2025
@KeranYang
Copy link
Member Author

KeranYang commented May 3, 2025

@yhl25 Thank you! Fixed. Also updated #183 title.

@KeranYang KeranYang merged commit 57e4214 into main May 3, 2025
5 checks passed
@KeranYang KeranYang deleted the si branch May 3, 2025 17:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants