Conda-forge happy build changes & switching to released sleef-3.9 #51
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SwayamInSync
changed the title
Member
Author
|
This is now ready for review, conda-forge CI is also happy |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is open to incorporate changes to ensure happy conda-forge build :)
Till now we were using the unreleased sleef-4.0 version, which is not available on platforms like conda-forge, so it'll be hard to the cross-compilation there.
This PR adds the support to SLEEF 3.9, which is also compatible with numpy-quaddtype and all the tests worked as expected.
This PR also checks make the meson confirm the system-wide sleef installation version must match with the required one.