Skip to content

Conversation

@c2bo
Copy link
Member

@c2bo c2bo commented Dec 8, 2025

4. Application of additional restrictions and policies are at the discretion of the Relying Party.
1. Application of additional restrictions and policies are at the discretion of the Relying Party.

1. Implementations MUST be able to support a Status List Token in CWT Format in an untagged form (i.e., no CWT tag and no cose-sign1 tag).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would have assumed we may want to be even stronger here saying that only the untagged variant is allowed?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we could, but would other language make a normative difference?

@paulbastian paulbastian merged commit bb5a467 into main Dec 9, 2025
2 checks passed
@paulbastian paulbastian deleted the 311-cbor-tag branch December 9, 2025 07:48
paulbastian added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CWT CBOR Tag

4 participants