-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
311 cbor tag #316
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
311 cbor tag #316
Conversation
draft-ietf-oauth-status-list.md
Outdated
| 4. Application of additional restrictions and policies are at the discretion of the Relying Party. | ||
| 1. Application of additional restrictions and policies are at the discretion of the Relying Party. | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Implementations MUST be able to support a Status List Token in CWT Format in an untagged form (i.e., no CWT tag and no cose-sign1 tag). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would have assumed we may want to be even stronger here saying that only the untagged variant is allowed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we could, but would other language make a normative difference?
0105b28 to
43abb20
Compare
This reverts commit bb5a467.
Closes #311
Rendered version: https://drafts.oauth.net/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list/311-cbor-tag/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list.html