Add translation adapter interface for self-hosted backends#174
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 56 minutes and 51 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary
This PR introduces a translation adapter boundary plus a LibreTranslate-oriented adapter path.
It is intentionally separate from the browser-native PR so the self-hosted / backend-driven path can be evaluated independently from the local Translator API experiment.
What this does
What this does not do
How this relates to the other open translation work
The intent is to keep these reviewable independently:
Deployment follow-up
For maintainers who want an operational next-step note for a self-hosted deployment, I wrote a separate follow-up here:
That note is intentionally about deployment and reverse-proxy/service layout. It should be read as follow-up guidance for the self-hosted path, not as proof that this PR already provides an IRC-side network translation layer.