docs: spec v2.0.4 protocol audit and Phase 9–12 improvement roadmap#37
docs: spec v2.0.4 protocol audit and Phase 9–12 improvement roadmap#37
Conversation
Co-authored-by: hotlong <50353452+hotlong@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request provides a comprehensive audit of the mobile codebase against @objectstack/spec@2.0.4 protocol specifications. The audit identifies 15 compliance gaps across automation, AI, UI rendering, and collaboration modules, and produces a detailed phased remediation plan (Phases 9-12) to address these gaps.
Changes:
- Updated spec audit documentation from v2.0.1 to v2.0.4 with new gap analysis findings
- Added Phases 9-12 roadmap covering automation hooks, SDUI page composition, AI sessions/RAG/MCP, and collaboration/CRDT features
- Updated SDK version references across all status documents to reflect v2.0.4 upgrade
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/SDK-GAP-ANALYSIS.md | Added v2.0.4 spec audit section with 15 new gap entries, spec module coverage matrix, and protocol compliance assessment against SDUI rules |
| docs/NEXT-PHASE.md | Added Phases 9-12 with spec-aligned deliverables, time estimates, and 8 new upstream hook requests for SDK team |
| docs/PROJECT-STATUS.md | Updated SDK version references to 2.0.4 and added spec alignment summary highlighting 15 compliance gaps |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| ### Spec 模块覆盖率 | ||
|
|
||
| | Spec Module | Schemas | Client Exposed | Mobile Implemented | Coverage | | ||
| |-------------|---------|---------------|-------------------|----------| | ||
| | `spec/api` | ~200+ types | ✅ 完整 | ✅ 95%+ | 🟢 | | ||
| | `spec/data` | ~60 types (Field, Query, Filter, Driver) | ✅ 通过 client.data | ✅ 完整 | 🟢 | | ||
| | `spec/ui` | ~60 types (View, Form, Dashboard, Report, Page, Widget, Theme) | ⚠️ 部分 (通过 meta) | ⚠️ 80% (缺 Report, Page, Widget) | 🟡 | | ||
| | `spec/system` | ~200+ types (Cache, Storage, Logging, Audit, Collaboration, CRDT) | ⚠️ 部分 | ⚠️ 50% (缺 Collaboration, Audit) | 🟡 | | ||
| | `spec/ai` | ~100+ types (Agent, RAG, MCP, Conversation, Cost) | ⚠️ 仅 NLQ/Chat/Suggest/Insights | ⚠️ 30% (缺 RAG, MCP, Agent, Session) | 🔴 | | ||
| | `spec/automation` | ~50 types (Flow, ETL, Approval, StateMachine, Connector) | ⚠️ 仅 trigger() | ⚠️ 20% (仅 trigger in ActionExecutor) | 🔴 | | ||
| | `spec/kernel` | ~150+ types (Plugin, Event, FeatureFlag, Metadata) | ❌ 不适用 (服务端) | — | — | | ||
| | `spec/hub` | ~30 types (Tenant, Registry, Plans) | ⚠️ 部分 | ❌ 未实现 | 🔴 | | ||
| | `spec/contracts` | ~15 interfaces (IDataEngine, IHttpServer, IServiceRegistry) | ❌ 不适用 (服务端接口) | — | — | | ||
| | `spec/integration` | ~80 types (Connectors, FileStorage, MessageQueue, GitHub, Vercel) | ❌ 不适用 (服务端) | — | — | | ||
| | `spec/studio` | ~15 types (StudioPlugin, Contributions) | ❌ 不适用 (桌面端) | — | — | | ||
| | `spec/permission` | (通过 api 模块) | ✅ 通过 client.permissions | ✅ 完整 | 🟢 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The "Spec 模块覆盖率" table is missing three of the 15 spec modules mentioned in line 38. The text claims to audit "15 个模块（root, driver, data, system, auth, kernel, hub, ai, automation, api, ui, contracts, integration, studio, permission）" but the coverage matrix only includes 12 modules (missing root, driver, and auth).
Either add rows for the missing modules (spec/root, spec/driver, spec/auth) or update line 38 to accurately reflect that only 12 modules have a coverage assessment in this table.
Full audit of mobile codebase against
@objectstack/spec@2.0.4(15 protocol modules). Identified 15 compliance gaps and produced a phased remediation plan.Gap analysis
Scanned all spec exports (
api,ui,data,system,ai,automation,kernel,hub,contracts,integration,studio,permission) against@objectstack/client@2.0.4API surface and current mobile implementation (23 hooks, 24 lib modules, 12 view renderers).Key findings by priority:
useAutomationhook (trigger only used inline inActionExecutor), package management limited tolist()only (5 client methods unused), no approval process UIReportSchemarenderer, no SDUIPageSchemacomposition (spec Rule Scaffold ObjectStack Mobile runtime with Expo Router, NativeWind v4, and shadcn-style UI #1), AI conversation sessions lack persistence/token budgets, RAG/collaboration not implementedThemeSchema, widget registry, MCP/agent orchestration, audit log viewer, flow visualizationChanges
docs/NEXT-PHASE.md— Added Phases 9–12 with spec-aligned deliverables:docs/SDK-GAP-ANALYSIS.md— Updated from v2.0.1 → v2.0.4 analysis. Added spec module coverage matrix, protocol compliance assessment againstimplement-objectui.mdrules, and 15 new gap entries.docs/PROJECT-STATUS.md— Updated SDK version references and added spec alignment summary.All 493 existing tests pass unchanged.
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.