Add implementation status tracking to protocol documentation #33
Conversation
Co-authored-by: hotlong <50353452+hotlong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: hotlong <50353452+hotlong@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds comprehensive implementation status tracking to protocol documentation, addressing the lack of visibility into which features are production-ready versus planned. It introduces a centralized status tracking page and updates all protocol documentation with status badges and completion percentages.
Changes:
- New central implementation status tracking document with 59 components across 10 categories
- Status badges and component tables added to all protocol documentation files
- Navigation sidebar updated with link to implementation status page
- Roadmap timeline for Q1-Q4 2026 with planned features
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
docs/protocol/implementation-status.md |
New centralized status tracking page with component inventory, roadmap, and contribution guidelines |
docs/protocol/form.md |
Added 100% complete status badge and component implementation table |
docs/protocol/view.md |
Added 100% complete status badge and view component status table |
docs/protocol/page.md |
Added 75% complete status badge and page feature status breakdown |
docs/protocol/object.md |
Added planned status badge indicating Q2 2026 implementation |
docs/protocol/menu.md |
Added 40% complete status badge with navigation component breakdown |
docs/protocol/report.md |
Added planned status badge indicating Q3-Q4 2026 implementation |
docs/protocol/app.md |
Added planned status badge indicating Q4 2026 implementation |
docs/protocol/overview.md |
Added status icons to all protocol links and link to implementation status page |
docs/.vitepress/config.mts |
Added "📊 Implementation Status" link to sidebar navigation |
docs/protocol/view.md
Outdated
| ### View Component Implementation | ||
|
|
||
| | Component | Status | Package | Notes | | ||
| |:----------|:-------|:--------|:------| | ||
| | List | ✅ Implemented | @object-ui/components | Ordered/unordered lists | | ||
| | Table | ✅ Implemented | @object-ui/components | Basic HTML table | | ||
| | Data Table | ✅ Implemented | @object-ui/components | Advanced table with sorting, filtering, pagination | | ||
| | Kanban | ✅ Implemented | @object-ui/components | Drag-and-drop kanban board | | ||
| | Calendar View | ✅ Implemented | @object-ui/components | Full calendar with events | | ||
| | Timeline | ✅ Implemented | @object-ui/components | Timeline/Gantt chart | | ||
| | Card | ✅ Implemented | @object-ui/components | Card layout component | | ||
| | Grid | ✅ Implemented | @object-ui/components | CSS Grid layout | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The 'View Component Implementation' section lists components like List, Table, Grid, and Card, but these appear to be general UI components rather than view types. View types (as mentioned in the table above with 'list', 'grid', 'kanban', etc.) are distinct from layout/display components. This section may confuse readers about what 'view types' actually means in the ObjectQL context versus generic UI components. Consider clarifying the distinction or renaming the section to 'Related UI Components' or 'View Rendering Components'.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in ec21294. Renamed section to "View Rendering Components" with clarifying text and added "Used By View Types" column to show the mapping between UI components and view types.
…ew.md Co-authored-by: hotlong <50353452+hotlong@users.noreply.github.com>
|
✅ All checks passed!
|
Implementation Status Tracking for Metadata Specification ✅
Completed Tasks:
Summary
Successfully added comprehensive implementation status tracking to all protocol documentation with reviewer feedback addressed.
Changes
Status Coverage
Original prompt
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.