Expand yield metrics reported, and make them easier to compare#488
Expand yield metrics reported, and make them easier to compare#488KatunaNorbert merged 15 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
The metrics are looking good, we should decide which one to show. Looks like |
|
when you toggle the columns, some values go from 0.00% to 0 and others from 0.00% to datafarming.-.Ocean.Farm.-.3.March.2023.mp4 |
|
These metrics are fine, but we keep adding information to the user. We need to filter out what's most relevant for the user. While doing some discovery I came across some products that are doing a great good displaying this information, for what I can see most platform play around with APR and APY this way: This might not be exactly our use case, but it can help us identifying what're the most important metrics to show. for what i see, simplicity is key for the user. |
|
I thought we had agreed in the meeting to get rid of the annualised numbers (APY and APR)? By taking the yield for the round and multiplying it by 52, we are not creating helpful information for the user - we are just extrapolating to present unreliable figures to them. |
|
As discussed, we still want to lead with APY (it's the industry standard way of communicating the variable annual compound rate).
Please see discussion on slack |
Yeah, I'd still prefer for us to avoid APY altogether, but if we must show it then it makes sense to acknowledge the variability.
I find this confusing. APY is an annualised rate, so why would a user want to see it averaged over a three-week period? |
|
I propose the following steps:
|
Yes, this is the intention. we are working on a quick mockup for it on miro. |
|
Added extendable row containing current and last round APYs |
|
@EnzoVezzaro Thanks for letting me know, although I don't think we want to get all those changes in this PR. Let's just add the APY/APR/Yield and keep updating the extended row in other PRs. |
|
That was removed on @idiom-bytes request |
I see 👍🏽 |













Fixes #487
DoD:
Additionally: