Skip to content

Conversation

@AntoineVDV
Copy link
Collaborator

Both the functional and technical name of the ir.rule model is "Record
Rule". This commit makes sure that all occurrences of "Access Rule" are
replaced by the correct name "Record Rule" as it was easily confused
with "Access Rights".

Original PR: #1118

Both the functional and technical name of the `ir.rule` model is "Record
Rule". This commit makes sure that all occurrences of "Access Rule" are
replaced by the correct name "Record Rule" as it was easily confused
with "Access Rights".

Original PR: #1118
@robodoo
Copy link
Collaborator

robodoo commented Dec 15, 2021

@C3POdoo C3POdoo requested a review from a team December 15, 2021 11:45
@AntoineVDV AntoineVDV requested review from Feyensv and removed request for a team December 15, 2021 11:46
@Feyensv
Copy link
Collaborator

Feyensv commented Dec 15, 2021

@robodoo r+

robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2021
Both the functional and technical name of the `ir.rule` model is "Record
Rule". This commit makes sure that all occurrences of "Access Rule" are
replaced by the correct name "Record Rule" as it was easily confused
with "Access Rights".

Original PR: #1118

closes #1421

Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
@robodoo robodoo closed this Dec 15, 2021
@robodoo robodoo temporarily deployed to merge December 15, 2021 13:12 Inactive
@fw-bot fw-bot deleted the 14.0-rename_access_rules_to_record_rules-anv branch December 29, 2021 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants