feat: ✨ naming convention for files and variables #146
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Luke W. Johnston <lwjohnst86@users.noreply.github.com>
lwjohnst86
requested changes
Dec 8, 2025
Member
lwjohnst86
left a comment
lwjohnst86
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! Some more mostly formatting changes.
lwjohnst86
changed the title
Co-authored-by: Luke W. Johnston <lwjohnst86@users.noreply.github.com>
danielibsen
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2025
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In Review
to In Progress
in Data Activity
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
I've tried to put together the guidance on naming conventions for files and variables based mostly on the established practices from SDCC. I've placed it in a new folder. We can have a chat about whether or not we want to move it to a different repo later.
Closes #132
This PR needs an in-depth review.
Checklist
just run-all