Skip to content

Conversation

@toddbaert
Copy link
Member

Making access modifiers for supposedly public classes public.

Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <toddbaert@gmail.com>
@toddbaert
Copy link
Member Author

Closes: #211

Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <toddbaert@gmail.com>
@toddbaert
Copy link
Member Author

@dabeeeenster @ajhelsby I also noticed that the FlagsmithClient was a a static member. That seems like it could be a potential problem to me if users instantiate multiple flagsmith providers (probably an edge case). Our bug check pointed it out when I made the class public.

I've made the internal flagsmith member and instance member now. Is that OK?

Copy link

@glaucioscheibel glaucioscheibel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@toddbaert toddbaert merged commit 137497a into main Feb 7, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2023
DBlanchard88 pushed a commit to DBlanchard88/java-sdk-contrib that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
…e#213)

Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants