Fix bigquery e2e region#26754
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR updates the BigQuery ingestion connector to support region-aware INFORMATION_SCHEMA queries so that stored procedure metadata and table DDL retrieval work for datasets outside the default/engine location.
Changes:
- Added new region-scoped query templates for stored procedures and table DDLs.
- Updated BigQuery metadata ingestion logic to choose region-scoped vs dataset-scoped queries based on dataset location.
- Added unit tests validating region routing, fallback behavior, and graceful error handling.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
ingestion/src/metadata/ingestion/source/database/bigquery/queries.py |
Adds region-aware SQL templates for ROUTINES and TABLES (DDL). |
ingestion/src/metadata/ingestion/source/database/bigquery/metadata.py |
Uses dataset location to route stored procedure + DDL queries to region-scoped INFORMATION_SCHEMA. |
ingestion/tests/unit/topology/database/test_bigquery.py |
Adds unit tests covering region-aware query selection and failure paths. |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️ Target:
|
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core |
CVE-2025-52999 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.15.0 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core |
CVE-2025-52999 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.13.4 | 2.15.0 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind |
CVE-2022-42003 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind |
CVE-2022-42004 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4 |
com.google.code.gson:gson |
CVE-2022-25647 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.2.4 | 2.8.9 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2021-22569 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3509 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3510 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2024-7254 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2021-22569 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3509 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3510 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2024-7254 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2 |
com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt |
CVE-2023-52428 | 🚨 HIGH | 9.8.1 | 9.37.2 |
com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp |
CVE-2021-0341 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.12.12 | 4.9.2 |
commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils |
CVE-2025-48734 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.9.4 | 1.11.0 |
commons-io:commons-io |
CVE-2024-47554 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.8.0 | 2.14.0 |
dnsjava:dnsjava |
CVE-2024-25638 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.1.7 | 3.6.0 |
io.airlift:aircompressor |
CVE-2025-67721 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.27 | 2.0.3 |
io.netty:netty-codec-http |
CVE-2026-33870 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.132.Final, 4.2.10.Final |
io.netty:netty-codec-http2 |
CVE-2025-55163 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final |
io.netty:netty-codec-http2 |
CVE-2026-33871 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.132.Final, 4.2.11.Final |
io.netty:netty-codec-http2 |
GHSA-xpw8-rcwv-8f8p | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.100.Final |
io.netty:netty-handler |
CVE-2025-24970 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.118.Final |
net.minidev:json-smart |
CVE-2021-31684 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.3.2 | 1.3.3, 2.4.4 |
net.minidev:json-smart |
CVE-2023-1370 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.3.2 | 2.4.9 |
org.apache.avro:avro |
CVE-2024-47561 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 1.7.7 | 1.11.4 |
org.apache.avro:avro |
CVE-2023-39410 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.7.7 | 1.11.3 |
org.apache.derby:derby |
CVE-2022-46337 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 10.14.2.0 | 10.14.3, 10.15.2.1, 10.16.1.2, 10.17.1.0 |
org.apache.ivy:ivy |
CVE-2022-46751 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.5.1 | 2.5.2 |
org.apache.mesos:mesos |
CVE-2018-1330 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.4.3 | 1.6.0 |
org.apache.spark:spark-core_2.12 |
CVE-2025-54920 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.5.6 | 3.5.7 |
org.apache.thrift:libthrift |
CVE-2019-0205 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.12.0 | 0.13.0 |
org.apache.thrift:libthrift |
CVE-2020-13949 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.12.0 | 0.14.0 |
org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper |
CVE-2023-44981 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 3.6.3 | 3.7.2, 3.8.3, 3.9.1 |
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server |
CVE-2024-13009 | 🚨 HIGH | 9.4.56.v20240826 | 9.4.57.v20241219 |
org.lz4:lz4-java |
CVE-2025-12183 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.8.0 | 1.8.1 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: Node.js
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: Python
Vulnerabilities (15)
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
apache-airflow |
CVE-2025-68438 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.6 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2025-68675 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.6, 2.11.1 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2026-26929 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.8 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2026-28779 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.8 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2026-30911 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.8 |
cryptography |
CVE-2026-26007 | 🚨 HIGH | 42.0.8 | 46.0.5 |
jaraco.context |
CVE-2026-23949 | 🚨 HIGH | 5.3.0 | 6.1.0 |
jaraco.context |
CVE-2026-23949 | 🚨 HIGH | 6.0.1 | 6.1.0 |
pyOpenSSL |
CVE-2026-27459 | 🚨 HIGH | 24.1.0 | 26.0.0 |
starlette |
CVE-2025-62727 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.48.0 | 0.49.1 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2025-66418 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.0 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2025-66471 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.0 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2026-21441 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.3 |
wheel |
CVE-2026-24049 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.45.1 | 0.46.2 |
wheel |
CVE-2026-24049 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.45.1 | 0.46.2 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/extended_sample_data.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/lineage.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_data.json
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_data.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_data_aut.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage.json
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage_aut.yaml
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️ Target:
|
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
libpam-modules |
CVE-2025-6020 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.5.2-6+deb12u1 | 1.5.2-6+deb12u2 |
libpam-modules-bin |
CVE-2025-6020 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.5.2-6+deb12u1 | 1.5.2-6+deb12u2 |
libpam-runtime |
CVE-2025-6020 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.5.2-6+deb12u1 | 1.5.2-6+deb12u2 |
libpam0g |
CVE-2025-6020 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.5.2-6+deb12u1 | 1.5.2-6+deb12u2 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: Java
Vulnerabilities (37)
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core |
CVE-2025-52999 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.15.0 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core |
CVE-2025-52999 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.13.4 | 2.15.0 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind |
CVE-2022-42003 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2 |
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind |
CVE-2022-42004 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.12.7 | 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4 |
com.google.code.gson:gson |
CVE-2022-25647 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.2.4 | 2.8.9 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2021-22569 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3509 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3510 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2024-7254 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.3.0 | 3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2021-22569 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3509 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2022-3510 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7 |
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java |
CVE-2024-7254 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.7.1 | 3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2 |
com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt |
CVE-2023-52428 | 🚨 HIGH | 9.8.1 | 9.37.2 |
com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp |
CVE-2021-0341 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.12.12 | 4.9.2 |
commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils |
CVE-2025-48734 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.9.4 | 1.11.0 |
commons-io:commons-io |
CVE-2024-47554 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.8.0 | 2.14.0 |
dnsjava:dnsjava |
CVE-2024-25638 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.1.7 | 3.6.0 |
io.airlift:aircompressor |
CVE-2025-67721 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.27 | 2.0.3 |
io.netty:netty-codec-http |
CVE-2026-33870 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.132.Final, 4.2.10.Final |
io.netty:netty-codec-http2 |
CVE-2025-55163 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final |
io.netty:netty-codec-http2 |
CVE-2026-33871 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.132.Final, 4.2.11.Final |
io.netty:netty-codec-http2 |
GHSA-xpw8-rcwv-8f8p | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.100.Final |
io.netty:netty-handler |
CVE-2025-24970 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.1.96.Final | 4.1.118.Final |
net.minidev:json-smart |
CVE-2021-31684 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.3.2 | 1.3.3, 2.4.4 |
net.minidev:json-smart |
CVE-2023-1370 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.3.2 | 2.4.9 |
org.apache.avro:avro |
CVE-2024-47561 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 1.7.7 | 1.11.4 |
org.apache.avro:avro |
CVE-2023-39410 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.7.7 | 1.11.3 |
org.apache.derby:derby |
CVE-2022-46337 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 10.14.2.0 | 10.14.3, 10.15.2.1, 10.16.1.2, 10.17.1.0 |
org.apache.ivy:ivy |
CVE-2022-46751 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.5.1 | 2.5.2 |
org.apache.mesos:mesos |
CVE-2018-1330 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.4.3 | 1.6.0 |
org.apache.spark:spark-core_2.12 |
CVE-2025-54920 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.5.6 | 3.5.7 |
org.apache.thrift:libthrift |
CVE-2019-0205 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.12.0 | 0.13.0 |
org.apache.thrift:libthrift |
CVE-2020-13949 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.12.0 | 0.14.0 |
org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper |
CVE-2023-44981 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 3.6.3 | 3.7.2, 3.8.3, 3.9.1 |
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server |
CVE-2024-13009 | 🚨 HIGH | 9.4.56.v20240826 | 9.4.57.v20241219 |
org.lz4:lz4-java |
CVE-2025-12183 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.8.0 | 1.8.1 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: Node.js
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: Python
Vulnerabilities (33)
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authlib |
CVE-2026-27962 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 1.6.6 | 1.6.9 |
Authlib |
CVE-2026-28490 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.6.6 | 1.6.9 |
Authlib |
CVE-2026-28498 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.6.6 | 1.6.9 |
Authlib |
CVE-2026-28802 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.6.6 | 1.6.7 |
PyJWT |
CVE-2026-32597 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.10.1 | 2.12.0 |
Werkzeug |
CVE-2024-34069 | 🚨 HIGH | 2.2.3 | 3.0.3 |
aiohttp |
CVE-2025-69223 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.12.12 | 3.13.3 |
aiohttp |
CVE-2025-69223 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.13.2 | 3.13.3 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2025-68438 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.6 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2025-68675 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.6, 2.11.1 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2026-26929 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.8 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2026-28779 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.8 |
apache-airflow |
CVE-2026-30911 | 🚨 HIGH | 3.1.5 | 3.1.8 |
apache-airflow-providers-http |
CVE-2025-69219 | 🚨 HIGH | 5.6.0 | 6.0.0 |
azure-core |
CVE-2026-21226 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.37.0 | 1.38.0 |
cryptography |
CVE-2026-26007 | 🚨 HIGH | 42.0.8 | 46.0.5 |
google-cloud-aiplatform |
CVE-2026-2472 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.130.0 | 1.131.0 |
google-cloud-aiplatform |
CVE-2026-2473 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.130.0 | 1.133.0 |
jaraco.context |
CVE-2026-23949 | 🚨 HIGH | 5.3.0 | 6.1.0 |
jaraco.context |
CVE-2026-23949 | 🚨 HIGH | 6.0.1 | 6.1.0 |
protobuf |
CVE-2026-0994 | 🚨 HIGH | 4.25.8 | 6.33.5, 5.29.6 |
pyOpenSSL |
CVE-2026-27459 | 🚨 HIGH | 24.1.0 | 26.0.0 |
pyasn1 |
CVE-2026-23490 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.6.1 | 0.6.2 |
pyasn1 |
CVE-2026-30922 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.6.1 | 0.6.3 |
python-multipart |
CVE-2026-24486 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.0.20 | 0.0.22 |
ray |
CVE-2025-62593 | 🔥 CRITICAL | 2.47.1 | 2.52.0 |
starlette |
CVE-2025-62727 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.48.0 | 0.49.1 |
tornado |
CVE-2026-31958 | 🚨 HIGH | 6.5.3 | 6.5.5 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2025-66418 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.0 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2025-66471 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.0 |
urllib3 |
CVE-2026-21441 | 🚨 HIGH | 1.26.20 | 2.6.3 |
wheel |
CVE-2026-24049 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.45.1 | 0.46.2 |
wheel |
CVE-2026-24049 | 🚨 HIGH | 0.45.1 | 0.46.2 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: usr/bin/docker
Vulnerabilities (4)
| Package | Vulnerability ID | Severity | Installed Version | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
stdlib |
CVE-2025-68121 | 🔥 CRITICAL | v1.25.5 | 1.24.13, 1.25.7, 1.26.0-rc.3 |
stdlib |
CVE-2025-61726 | 🚨 HIGH | v1.25.5 | 1.24.12, 1.25.6 |
stdlib |
CVE-2025-61728 | 🚨 HIGH | v1.25.5 | 1.24.12, 1.25.6 |
stdlib |
CVE-2026-25679 | 🚨 HIGH | v1.25.5 | 1.25.8, 1.26.1 |
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key
No Vulnerabilities Found
🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️
Target: /home/airflow/openmetadata-airflow-apis/openmetadata_managed_apis.egg-info/PKG-INFO
No Vulnerabilities Found
🟡 Playwright Results — all passed (20 flaky)✅ 3419 passed · ❌ 0 failed · 🟡 20 flaky · ⏭️ 223 skipped
🟡 20 flaky test(s) (passed on retry)
How to debug locally# Download playwright-test-results-<shard> artifact and unzip
npx playwright show-trace path/to/trace.zip # view trace |
| dataset_obj = self.get_dataset_obj(schema_name) | ||
| location = getattr(dataset_obj, "location", None) | ||
| except Exception as exc: | ||
| logger.debug(traceback.format_exc()) | ||
| logger.debug( | ||
| "Could not retrieve dataset location for '%s.%s', " | ||
| "falling back to dataset-scoped query: %s", | ||
| database, | ||
| schema_name, | ||
| exc, | ||
| ) | ||
| location = None | ||
|
|
||
| query = ( | ||
| BIGQUERY_GET_TABLE_DDLS_BY_REGION.format( | ||
| database_name=database, | ||
| schema_name=schema_name, | ||
| region=location, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The dataset-location lookup + region-vs-dataset scoped query selection logic is duplicated here and again in get_stored_procedures(). Consider extracting a small helper (e.g., get_dataset_location(schema_name) + build_information_schema_query(template_by_region, template_by_dataset, ...)) so the fallback behavior and logging stay consistent as this evolves.
| database = self.context.get().database | ||
| schema = self.context.get().database_schema | ||
| try: | ||
| dataset_obj = self.get_dataset_obj(schema) | ||
| location = getattr(dataset_obj, "location", None) | ||
| except Exception as exc: | ||
| logger.debug(traceback.format_exc()) | ||
| logger.debug( | ||
| "Could not retrieve dataset location for '%s.%s', " | ||
| "falling back to dataset-scoped query: %s", | ||
| database, | ||
| schema, | ||
| exc, | ||
| ) | ||
| location = None | ||
| query = ( | ||
| BIGQUERY_GET_STORED_PROCEDURES_BY_REGION.format( | ||
| database_name=database, | ||
| schema_name=schema, | ||
| region=location, | ||
| ) | ||
| if location | ||
| else BIGQUERY_GET_STORED_PROCEDURES.format( | ||
| database_name=database, | ||
| schema_name=schema, | ||
| ) | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This repeats the same dataset-location lookup + region-vs-dataset scoped query selection pattern as _prefetch_table_ddls(). To avoid the two code paths drifting (e.g., different fallback rules or normalization), consider refactoring this into a shared helper used by both methods.
Code Review
|
| Compact |
|
Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar
|
* Fix Bigquery region * Add tests * address comments --------- Co-authored-by: Mayur Singal <39544459+ulixius9@users.noreply.github.com>



Describe your changes:
This pull request enhances the BigQuery connector to support region-aware INFORMATION_SCHEMA queries, ensuring that metadata retrieval (for stored procedures and table DDLs) works correctly for datasets located outside the default region. It introduces new region-aware query templates, updates the main logic to use them when appropriate, and adds thorough unit tests to verify correct behavior and error handling.
Region-aware query support:
BIGQUERY_GET_STORED_PROCEDURES_BY_REGIONandBIGQUERY_GET_TABLE_DDLS_BY_REGIONinqueries.pyto support querying INFORMATION_SCHEMA in a region-specific manner. [1] [2]metadata.pyto include the new region-aware queries.BigQuery metadata retrieval logic:
_prefetch_table_ddlsandget_stored_proceduresinmetadata.pyto detect the dataset's region and use the appropriate region-aware query if a location is set, falling back to the original query otherwise. Improved error handling and logging for cases when the dataset or query fails. [1] [2]Testing:
TestBigqueryRegionAwareQueries) to verify that region-aware queries are used when appropriate, that the fallback logic works, and that failures are handled gracefully without propagating exceptions or recording producer failures.I worked on ... because ...
Type of change:
Checklist:
Fixes <issue-number>: <short explanation>