Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 30, 2022. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@ggouaillardet
Copy link
Contributor

orte_process_name_t is aligned on 32 bits, so it cannot simply be casted
into an int64_t. use memcpy() instead

Thanks Paul Hargrove for the report

(back-ported from commit open-mpi/ompi@0b8c582)

orte_process_name_t is aligned on 32 bits, so it cannot simply be casted
into an int64_t. use memcpy() instead

Thanks Paul Hargrove for the report

(back-ported from commit open-mpi/ompi@0b8c582)
@ggouaillardet ggouaillardet changed the title oob/usock: fix handling of orte_process_name_t * v2.x: oob/usock: fix handling of orte_process_name_t * Sep 1, 2016
@mellanox-github
Copy link

Test PASSed.
See http://bgate.mellanox.com/jenkins/job/gh-ompi-release-pr/2147/ for details.

@ggouaillardet
Copy link
Contributor Author

:bot🏷️bug
:bot🏷️blocker
:bot:milestone:v2.0.1
:bot:assign: @rhc54

@hppritcha this was reported by Paul Hargrove with v2.0.1rc2
though alignment sensitive archs are impacted (sparc, ...) I hope it can be integrated into v2.0.1

@rhc54
Copy link

rhc54 commented Sep 1, 2016

👍

@jsquyres
Copy link
Member

jsquyres commented Sep 1, 2016

Per discussion with @rhc54, this is really a blocker. The patch is straightforward, the risk is low, and this does fix a common error that occurred in real testing. Merging.

@jsquyres jsquyres merged commit 651f712 into open-mpi:v2.x Sep 1, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants