Skip to content

Conversation

@jsquyres
Copy link
Member

We were assuming that the array_of_indices has the same size as the
number of requests (incount), instead of the numberr of actually
active requests. While the patch is trivial, the question of the
size of the array_of_indices should be clarified in the MPI Forum.

Signed-off-by: George Bosilca bosilca@icl.utk.edu
(cherry picked from commit a5fbfa4)

v4.0.x RMs: According to #4897, this is necessary for MPI conformance.

We were assuming that the array_of_indices has the same size as the
number of requests (incount), instead of the numberr of actually
active requests. While the patch is trivial, the question of the
size of the array_of_indices should be clarified in the MPI Forum.

Signed-off-by: George Bosilca <bosilca@icl.utk.edu>
(cherry picked from commit a5fbfa4)
@jsquyres jsquyres added the bug label Sep 18, 2018
@jsquyres jsquyres added this to the v4.0.0 milestone Sep 18, 2018
@jsquyres jsquyres requested review from bosilca and hjelmn September 18, 2018 19:09
@hppritcha hppritcha merged commit 19e0289 into open-mpi:v4.0.x Sep 20, 2018
@jsquyres jsquyres deleted the pr/v4.0.x/be-conservative-with-mpi-wait-indexes branch September 25, 2019 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants