Skip to content

Fallback display names for TUI skill mentions#18786

Merged
canvrno-oai merged 1 commit intomainfrom
canvrno/tui_mentions_adj
Apr 21, 2026
Merged

Fallback display names for TUI skill mentions#18786
canvrno-oai merged 1 commit intomainfrom
canvrno/tui_mentions_adj

Conversation

@canvrno-oai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This updates TUI skill mentions to show a fallback label when a skill does not define a display name, so unnamed skills remain understandable in the picker without changing behavior for skills that already have one.

Screenshot 2026-04-20 at 6 25 15 PM

@canvrno-oai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@canvrno-oai canvrno-oai marked this pull request as ready for review April 21, 2026 02:32
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@etraut-openai etraut-openai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

I built locally and tested with a custom plugin that contained a skill without a display name.

@canvrno-oai canvrno-oai merged commit 2cc146f into main Apr 21, 2026
25 checks passed
@canvrno-oai canvrno-oai deleted the canvrno/tui_mentions_adj branch April 21, 2026 03:46
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants