Add derive types for ResponseMessageAnnotation #649
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ShivangiReja
requested review from
joseharriaga and
trrwilson
as code owners
…hreja/Issue_447_ResponseAnnotation
christothes
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2025
joseharriaga
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2025
joseharriaga
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2025
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change makes
ResponseMessageAnnotationderived classes public so they can be used as input when constructing items such asResponseContentPart. This resolves the limitation where annotations could only be treated as output and could not be passed into APIs requiring input annotations.Issue: #447