docs: clarify fallback when no good first issue labels are open (AI-assisted)#58530
Conversation
|
This is my first open-source contribution to OpenClaw, so feedback is very welcome. I kept this PR intentionally small and focused. |
Greptile SummaryThis PR updates a single paragraph in Confidence Score: 5/5This is a safe docs-only change with no code, logic, or functional impact. Single-paragraph documentation edit with no code changes. The filtered GitHub URL is correctly encoded, the added guidance is accurate and helpful, and no custom instruction rules are violated. No files require special attention.
|
| Filename | Overview |
|---|---|
| CONTRIBUTING.md | Single-paragraph update converting a plain issues link to a filtered 'good first issue' link and adding a fallback suggestion for new contributors. |
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "Docs: clarify first-contribution fallbac..." | Re-trigger Greptile
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates contributor guidance to reduce onboarding friction when no good first issue items are available, by directing first-time contributors to claim a small docs/bug issue instead.
Changes:
- Replaces the generic “check good first issue labels” guidance with a direct link to the filtered
good first issuequery. - Adds fallback instructions to pick a small docs/bug issue and comment to claim it when none are open.
fabianwilliams
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM — reviewed code, tests, and approach. Clean implementation.
Summary
Updates
CONTRIBUTING.mdto clarify what first-time contributors should do when there are no opengood first issuelabels:pick a small docs/bug issue and leave a quick comment to claim it.
Why
This helps new contributors avoid getting blocked when the
good first issuequeue is empty.Testing
Docs-only change.