fix(model-picker): list each provider/model combo separately#970
Merged
steipete merged 2 commits intoopenclaw:mainfrom Jan 15, 2026
Merged
fix(model-picker): list each provider/model combo separately#970steipete merged 2 commits intoopenclaw:mainfrom
steipete merged 2 commits intoopenclaw:mainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
That'a a great cleanup, thanks! |
Previously, /model grouped models by name and showed all providers that offer the same model (e.g. 'claude-sonnet-4-5 — anthropic, google-antigravity'). This was confusing because: 1. Users couldn't tell which provider would be used when selecting by number 2. The display implied choice between providers but selection was automatic Now each provider/model combination is listed separately so users can explicitly select the exact provider they want. - Remove model grouping in buildModelPickerItems - Display format changed from 'model — providers' to 'provider/model' - pickProviderForModel now returns the single provider directly - Updated tests to reflect new behavior
steipete
force-pushed
the
fix/model-picker-no-grouping
branch
from
4c4b840 to
0a2d36e
Compare
Contributor
|
Landed via temp rebase onto main. Thanks @mcinteerj! |
zooqueen
pushed a commit
to hanzoai/bot
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2026
…w#970) * fix(model-picker): list each provider/model combo separately Previously, /model grouped models by name and showed all providers that offer the same model (e.g. 'claude-sonnet-4-5 — anthropic, google-antigravity'). This was confusing because: 1. Users couldn't tell which provider would be used when selecting by number 2. The display implied choice between providers but selection was automatic Now each provider/model combination is listed separately so users can explicitly select the exact provider they want. - Remove model grouping in buildModelPickerItems - Display format changed from 'model — providers' to 'provider/model' - pickProviderForModel now returns the single provider directly - Updated tests to reflect new behavior * fix: simplify model picker entries (openclaw#970) (thanks @mcinteerj) --------- Co-authored-by: Keith the Silly Goose <keith@42bolton.macnet.nz> Co-authored-by: Peter Steinberger <steipete@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The
/modelcommand grouped models by name and showed all providers that offer the same model:This was confusing because:
Solution
Now each provider/model combination is listed separately:
Users can now explicitly select the exact provider they want.
Changes
buildModelPickerItemsmodel — providerstoprovider/modelpickProviderForModelnow returns the single provider directly