Table cells refactor to get rid of eslint nested components ignore

[jacobo-dominguez-wgu]

Description

This PR introduces a refactor on how the table cells components are declared in order to remove the eslint rule ignore for react/no-unstable-nested-components. The existing Table Cells and new Table Cells components were moved to a new file and the corresponding testing file was created.

Note

Considering the Table Cells components are small, all of them (currently 4) were moved to the same .tsx file, I am open to suggestions if each of the component should have its own file.

It closes #22

How to test it

• npm install && npm run dev
• Go to http://apps.local.openedx.io:2025/admin-console/authz/libraries/<YOUR_LIB_ID>
• On the Team Members table, make sure all the cells are displayed correctly

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @jacobo-dominguez-wgu!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/committers-frontend.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

---

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.43%. Comparing base (a0dc22c) to head (2a4fc94).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #31      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.32%   94.43%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          44       45       +1     
  Lines         881      899      +18     
  Branches      176      156      -20     
==========================================
+ Hits          831      849      +18     
  Misses         48       48              
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[arbrandes]

The change looks correct to me. Thanks!