chore: update @edx/brand dependency to new package @openedx/brand-openedx

[ttak-apphelix]

Description

This PR replaces brand-edx.org with openedx theme and adds it to the package file indirectly via aliasing.

Supporting information

Issue Link: edx/edx-arch-experiments#943

Link to the PR which is associated with the same issue
edx/configuration#230

[kdmccormick]

Thanks for the PR. I'm concerned about the size of the package-lock.json change-- that seems way to high of a line count for such a small package.json change. What command did you run to regenerate package-lock.json?

[robrap]

@ttak-apphelix: Next steps:

1. Work with @kdmccormick to see if you can get a simpler change set, regarding:

Thanks for the PR. I'm concerned about the size of the package-lock.json change-- that seems way to high of a line count for such a small package.json change. What command did you run to regenerate package-lock.json?

2. Did we already put QE resources toward testing changes? If not, let's do that, but after seeing if there is a simplification.
3. Once all this had been done, we'll continue to see if we can get 2U reviews. Thanks.

[ttak-apphelix]

Thanks for the PR. I'm concerned about the size of the package-lock.json change-- that seems way too high of a line count for such a small package.json change. What command did you run to regenerate package-lock.json?

@kdmccormick I was deleting node_module folder but by mistake I added package-lock.json file also. I have corrected that change and now it shows minimal changes in package-lock.json file

[ttak-apphelix]

@ttak-apphelix: Next steps:

1. Work with @kdmccormick to see if you can get a simpler change set, regarding:

Thanks for the PR. I'm concerned about the size of the package-lock.json change-- that seems way to high of a line count for such a small package.json change. What command did you run to regenerate package-lock.json?

2. Did we already put QE resources toward testing changes? If not, let's do that, but after seeing if there is a simplification.
3. Once all this had been done, we'll continue to see if we can get 2U reviews. Thanks.

@robrap

1. I have corrected the changes and they are minimal in package-lock.json.
2. I have tested myself and ran this branch on sandbox and everything is working as it was earlier.

[kdmccormick]

Thanks, the code looks good to me. I haven't tested, so please make sure some basic smoke-testing has been done before merging.

[edx-pipeline-bot]

2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX staging environment in preparation for a release to production.

[edx-pipeline-bot]

2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX production environment.