Skip to content

Conversation

@aaguiarz
Copy link
Member

@aaguiarz aaguiarz commented Aug 7, 2025

Potential fix for https://github.com/openfga/js-sdk/security/code-scanning/1

To fix the problem, add a permissions block to the workflow or job to explicitly restrict the GITHUB_TOKEN permissions. Since the Semgrep job only needs to check out code and run a scan, it only requires read access to repository contents. The best way to fix this is to add permissions: contents: read at the job level (under semgrep:), which will apply to this job only. This change should be made directly under the semgrep: job definition, before the name: key.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated security permissions for automated code scanning workflows.

…n permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The Semgrep GitHub Actions workflow was updated to include an explicit permissions block, granting the workflow read access to repository contents. No other steps or configurations within the workflow were altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Semgrep Workflow Permissions
.github/workflows/semgrep.yaml
Added explicit permissions: contents: read to the workflow job configuration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3f65221 and 55c78be.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/semgrep.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/semgrep.yaml (1)

8-9: Explicitly scoping the token to contents: read is the right move—double-check the job doesn’t later need broader scopes

Restricting the GITHUB_TOKEN to read-only hardens the workflow and resolves the code-scanning alert. ✅
Just verify that the job (or future additions such as uploading SARIF results) never requires security-events: write or any other scopes; otherwise you’ll see silent permission failures.

Looks good as-is.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch alert-autofix-1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@aaguiarz aaguiarz marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2025 16:42
@aaguiarz aaguiarz requested a review from a team as a code owner August 7, 2025 16:42
@aaguiarz aaguiarz enabled auto-merge August 7, 2025 17:11
@rhamzeh rhamzeh changed the title Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain permissions chore(ci): restrict semgrep workflow permissions to only read contents Aug 8, 2025
@aaguiarz aaguiarz added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit c9577ee Aug 8, 2025
19 of 21 checks passed
@aaguiarz aaguiarz deleted the alert-autofix-1 branch August 8, 2025 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants