Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis pull request refactors the weighted graph API by renaming the node weight accessor from Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
pkg/go/graph/weighted_graph.go(4 hunks)pkg/go/graph/weighted_graph_userset_test.go(7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
pkg/go/graph/weighted_graph.go (2)
pkg/go/graph/weighted_graph_node.go (1)
WeightedAuthorizationModelNode(18-27)pkg/go/graph/weighted_graph_edge.go (3)
WeightedAuthorizationModelEdge(58-76)DirectEdge(11-11)TTUEdge(21-21)
pkg/go/graph/weighted_graph_userset_test.go (1)
pkg/go/graph/weighted_graph.go (1)
Infinite(11-11)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
Description
What problem is being solved?
Surfacing the edge weight for userset
How is it being solved?
What changes are made to solve it?
References
Review Checklist
mainSummary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
GetWeight()toGetNodeWeight()for improved API clarity.New Features
GetEdgeWeight()method to compute and retrieve edge weights with enhanced support for edge-specific weight handling.