Skip to content

Conversation

@signedav
Copy link
Member

(since the t_id is written differently)

@signedav signedav requested a review from gacarrillor May 27, 2025 11:56
@gacarrillor
Copy link
Member

@signedav , is this ready for review?

@signedav
Copy link
Member Author

Yes. I'll fix the tests...

Copy link
Member

@gacarrillor gacarrillor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd rather attempt to use the member variables from DBConnector to get those names from the provider.

Not sure what's the best way to do so, though. If you find that passing the whole DB connector is too much (and I'd agree), perhaps we could have a single member dict variable my_db_connector.db_names or sth like that, that we could pass to other classes that need to have access to those names.

But this is just an idea, I hope we can find a good way to code it.

"OrderByFieldName": "seq",
},
)
print(editor_widget_setup)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

leftover

@signedav signedav merged commit ae4db72 into main Jun 6, 2025
5 checks passed
@signedav signedav deleted the valuerel branch June 6, 2025 07:21
@gacarrillor
Copy link
Member

@signedav , any comments on the review :) ?

@signedav
Copy link
Member Author

signedav commented Jun 6, 2025

@signedav , any comments on the review :) ?

Oh have overseen that. Sorry.

I will check it out next week and probably do a follow up.

signedav added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…he layer and use it in the generation of the project. This concerns #138 (review)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants