Skip to content

Conversation

@gacarrillor
Copy link
Member

(when using coalesceCatalogueRef)

… a BAG OF attribute (when using coalesceCatalogueRef)
@gacarrillor gacarrillor force-pushed the supress_catalogue_ref_if_not_bag_of branch from bf45678 to 60a88a2 Compare June 2, 2025 17:07
@gacarrillor gacarrillor requested a review from signedav June 2, 2025 17:30
@gacarrillor
Copy link
Member Author

@signedav, we still lack unit tests on this one, but I think I'll tackle the 3rd task (validator verbosity) before.

@gacarrillor gacarrillor changed the title Add method to supress any catalogue reference layer that doesn't have a BAG OF attribute Add method to suppress any catalogue reference layer that doesn't have a BAG OF attribute Jun 4, 2025
…GPKG and PG (MSSQL db connector does not find bag_ofs yet)
@gacarrillor
Copy link
Member Author

@signedav, we still lack unit tests on this one, but I think I'll tackle the 3rd task (validator verbosity) before.

Unit tests added ✅

Copy link
Member

@signedav signedav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good. Did it concerns LIST ... OF same as bag of? If not, this should be added, I guess...

@signedav
Copy link
Member

signedav commented Jun 6, 2025

If LIST OF is added, feel free to make another release of the Library (minor version), then bump it in QgisModelBaker to test and merge the PRs there @gacarrillor

…or GPKG and PG (MSSQL db connector does not find list_ofs yet)
@gacarrillor
Copy link
Member Author

Tests added for LISTs OF. It turned out that that case was already handled by this PR (I didn't know about that 😄).

@gacarrillor gacarrillor merged commit 9dd6436 into main Jun 6, 2025
5 checks passed
@gacarrillor gacarrillor deleted the supress_catalogue_ref_if_not_bag_of branch June 6, 2025 16:00
@gacarrillor
Copy link
Member Author

If LIST OF is added, feel free to make another release of the Library (minor version), then bump it in QgisModelBaker to test and merge the PRs there @gacarrillor

This is done! ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants