-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8303948: HsErrFileUtils.checkHsErrFileContent() fails to check the last pattern. #12970
Conversation
👋 Welcome back varada1110! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@varada1110 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This fix seems correct - thanks.
@varada1110 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 154 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@dholmes-ora, @tstuefe) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Thanks @dholmes-ora for reviewing the changes. |
/integrate |
@varada1110 |
Hotspot changes, including tests, require two reviewers. I'll try to get someone else to review and sponsor once done. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@varada1110 Ouch, thank you for finding that. Let's see how many tests now start failing :-/
Could a slightly more elegant patch not be to change the condition after the loop not from
< if (!positivePatternStack.isEmpty()) {
> if (currentPositivePattern != null) {
?
But I leave that up to you. Patch is also fine in its current form.
Thank you @tstuefe for the suggestion. I have made the changes please review it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So checking for null-ness covers the case of the last pattern not matching, regardless of whether there are any other patterns still to be checked. Yep that logic seems fine.
A nit with the explanatory comment though.
Still good to go |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Thanks. I will sponsor now.
/sponsor |
@dholmes-ora The PR has been updated since the change author (@varada1110) issued the |
/integrate |
@varada1110 |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit a72ba38.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@dholmes-ora @varada1110 Pushed as commit a72ba38. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
When last pattern in deque [positivePatternStack] is not matching in HsErrFile, it comes out of the loop and check whether the positivePatternStack is empty or not, which turns to be empty because the pollFirst() removes the pattern.
This has been noticed in the TestSigInfoInHsErrFile.java where the segfault address for AIX is set as "0x0*1400" instead of "0xffffffffffffffff", which should throw the expected error but the error is neglected due to empty deque and the test is passed.
JBS issue : 8303948
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/12970/head:pull/12970
$ git checkout pull/12970
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12970
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/12970/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12970
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12970
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12970.diff