8315871: Opensource five more Swing regression tests#15702
8315871: Opensource five more Swing regression tests#15702azuev-java wants to merge 4 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
Conversation
Clean up and move to open source five tests. javax/swing/AncestorNotifier/4817630/bug4817630.java javax/swing/BoxLayout/4191948/bug4191948.java javax/swing/ComponentInputMap/4248723/bug4248723.java javax/swing/DefaultBoundedRangeModel/4297953/bug4297953.java javax/swing/DefaultButtonModel/4097723/bug4097723.java
|
👋 Welcome back kizune! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@azuev-java The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
…53.java Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turbanoff@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turbanoff@gmail.com>
DamonGuy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. Just move the frame dispose code blocks to EDT.
| if (frame != null) { | ||
| frame.setVisible(false); | ||
| frame.dispose(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this if statement be run on EDT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In new version the entire method is being run on EDT.
| SwingUtilities.invokeAndWait(test::init); | ||
| test.start(); | ||
| } finally { | ||
| test.destroy(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Either destroy() or the if statement in destroy() for disposing the frame should be on EDT
|
Fixed found problems. |
|
@azuev-java This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 292 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit be9cc73.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@azuev-java Pushed as commit be9cc73. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Clean up and move to open source five tests.
javax/swing/AncestorNotifier/4817630/bug4817630.java
javax/swing/BoxLayout/4191948/bug4191948.java
javax/swing/ComponentInputMap/4248723/bug4248723.java
javax/swing/DefaultBoundedRangeModel/4297953/bug4297953.java
javax/swing/DefaultButtonModel/4097723/bug4097723.java
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15702/head:pull/15702$ git checkout pull/15702Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15702$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15702/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15702View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15702Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15702.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment