8336012: Fix usages of jtreg-reserved properties#20099
8336012: Fix usages of jtreg-reserved properties#20099sormuras wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back cstein! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@sormuras This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit e6c5aa7.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Please review this trivial test-only change to resolve a name clash with a jtreg-reserved property by removing the third option to control a test verbosity level via the
test.verbosesystem property.The fix assumes that the system property was only used in a manual scenario, like
make test TEST=...and a-Dtest.verbose=99equivalent. For such scenarios, the other two names (for example-DPrivateInvokeTest.verbose=99) are still supported.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20099/head:pull/20099$ git checkout pull/20099Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20099$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20099/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20099View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20099Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20099.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment