-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8344703: Compiler Implementation for Flexible Constructor Bodies #24505
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8344703: Compiler Implementation for Flexible Constructor Bodies #24505
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back mcimadamore! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@mcimadamore This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 45 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@mcimadamore The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| /* | |||
| * Copyright (c) 2018, 2019, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | |||
| * Copyright (c) 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did a bit of reshuffling here -- we had a single diagnostic test called PreviewFeatureUse which was only testing the warn.preview.feature.use.plural diagnostic. As a consequence, when I changed flexible constructor bodies to no longer be a preview feature, I started getting failures in CheckExamples because there was no test covering warn.preview.feature.use (e.g. w/o the trailing .plural). So I've added a test for both diagnostics (and renamed the old one to PreviewFeatureUsePlural).
vicente-romero-oracle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
lahodaj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
|
/jep JDK-8344702 |
|
@lahodaj |
vicente-romero-oracle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
liach
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should integrate at the current stage without waiting for anonymous or local class changes - those involve existing specification and is best done in their own RFEs.
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit c6ffacb.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@mcimadamore Pushed as commit c6ffacb. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This PR finalizes the Flexible Constructor Bodies feature with no semantics changes.
The main changes in this PR have to do with the various tests, which needed tweaking (e.g. to drop
@enablePreviewand fix corresponding golden files).We might, later on, incorporate a fix for this issue into this PR, depending on where the specification for this feature lands.
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24505/head:pull/24505$ git checkout pull/24505Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24505$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24505/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24505View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24505Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24505.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment