Skip to content

Conversation

@mcimadamore
Copy link
Contributor

@mcimadamore mcimadamore commented Apr 8, 2025

This PR finalizes the Flexible Constructor Bodies feature with no semantics changes.
The main changes in this PR have to do with the various tests, which needed tweaking (e.g. to drop @enablePreview and fix corresponding golden files).

We might, later on, incorporate a fix for this issue into this PR, depending on where the specification for this feature lands.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8353435 to be approved
  • Change requires a JEP request to be targeted

Issues

  • JDK-8344703: Compiler Implementation for Flexible Constructor Bodies (Sub-task - P4)
  • JDK-8344702: JEP 513: Flexible Constructor Bodies (JEP)
  • JDK-8353435: Compiler Implementation for Flexible Constructor Bodies (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24505/head:pull/24505
$ git checkout pull/24505

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24505
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24505/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24505

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24505

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24505.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@mcimadamore mcimadamore changed the title Initial push 8344703: Compiler Implementation for Flexible Constructor Bodies Apr 8, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 8, 2025

👋 Welcome back mcimadamore! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2025

@mcimadamore This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8344703: Compiler Implementation for Flexible Constructor Bodies

Reviewed-by: vromero, liach, jlahoda

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 45 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Apr 8, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2025

@mcimadamore The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 8, 2025
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2018, 2019, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did a bit of reshuffling here -- we had a single diagnostic test called PreviewFeatureUse which was only testing the warn.preview.feature.use.plural diagnostic. As a consequence, when I changed flexible constructor bodies to no longer be a preview feature, I started getting failures in CheckExamples because there was no test covering warn.preview.feature.use (e.g. w/o the trailing .plural). So I've added a test for both diagnostics (and renamed the old one to PreviewFeatureUsePlural).

@mcimadamore mcimadamore marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2025 11:31
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 8, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@lahodaj lahodaj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@lahodaj
Copy link
Contributor

lahodaj commented Apr 15, 2025

/jep JDK-8344702

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 15, 2025

@lahodaj
This pull request will not be integrated until the JEP JDK-8344702 has been targeted.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the jep label Apr 15, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label May 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed jep labels May 7, 2025
Copy link
Member

@liach liach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should integrate at the current stage without waiting for anonymous or local class changes - those involve existing specification and is best done in their own RFEs.

@mcimadamore
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 8, 2025

Going to push as commit c6ffacb.
Since your change was applied there have been 64 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 8, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 8, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 8, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 8, 2025

@mcimadamore Pushed as commit c6ffacb.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants