Skip to content

Conversation

@jaskarth
Copy link
Member

@jaskarth jaskarth commented May 15, 2025

Hi all,
This is a small patch to TestVectorZeroCount to make it only execute when C2 is enabled, to fix a timeout with -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=3. This test takes a long time to finish without C2 because it iterates through all of the integers twice. Since the intention of the test is to stress the C2-specific numberOfLeadingZeros and numberOfTrailingZeros intrinsics, I think it makes sense to limit it to running with C2 only.

Reviews would be appreciated!


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8355512: Test compiler/vectorization/TestVectorZeroCount.java times out with -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=3 (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25243/head:pull/25243
$ git checkout pull/25243

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25243
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25243/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25243

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25243

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25243.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 15, 2025

👋 Welcome back jkarthikeyan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 15, 2025

@jaskarth This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8355512: Test compiler/vectorization/TestVectorZeroCount.java times out with -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=3

Reviewed-by: chagedorn, epeter

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 282 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 15, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 15, 2025

@jaskarth The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label May 15, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 15, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks for fixing it!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 15, 2025
@eme64
Copy link
Contributor

eme64 commented May 15, 2025

@jaskarth @chhagedorn Hmm, this means that this test could not be run with GraalVM, for example. That's a shame.
Do we not have some way to assert that there should be "some fast compiler"? Ah, what does vm.flavor == "server" do? Because I have seen lines like vm.flavor == "server" & !vm.graal.enabled before.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 19, 2025
@jaskarth
Copy link
Member Author

@eme64 I think vm.flavor == "server" ensures that the test runs on server-class VMs, but I wasn't sure if manually setting the TieredStopAtLevel changes that designation. I looked at some more tests and I saw that they were using @requires vm.flavor == "server" & (vm.opt.TieredStopAtLevel == null | vm.opt.TieredStopAtLevel == 4), which looks like a good way to check for any tier4 compiler. I've updated the patch to use that method instead, which should let it run on graal as well.

@eme64
Copy link
Contributor

eme64 commented May 19, 2025

@jaskarth Thanks for doing the research on this, nice to see that there is a solution :)

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 19, 2025
@jaskarth
Copy link
Member Author

@eme64 @chhagedorn Thanks a lot for the reviews! Does testing need to be run on this change, or can I integrate it?

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good improvement!

@chhagedorn
Copy link
Member

chhagedorn commented May 19, 2025

@eme64 @chhagedorn Thanks a lot for the reviews! Does testing need to be run on this change, or can I integrate it?

I think it's good to go in since you only exclude it from running in the problematic scenarios.

@eme64
Copy link
Contributor

eme64 commented May 19, 2025

@jaskarth Thanks for asking. I'll run some testing, just to be safe :)

@jaskarth
Copy link
Member Author

@eme64 Any results with testing? :)

@eme64
Copy link
Contributor

eme64 commented May 26, 2025

@jaskarth All 🟢 , ship it! 🚢

@jaskarth
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the testing @eme64, an thank you for the review @chhagedorn!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 27, 2025

Going to push as commit 37d04a1.
Since your change was applied there have been 407 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 27, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 27, 2025

@jaskarth Pushed as commit 37d04a1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants