Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8261839: Error creating runtime package on macos without mac-package-identifier #2730

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

andyherrick
Copy link

@andyherrick andyherrick commented Feb 25, 2021

…age-identifier


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8261839: Error creating runtime package on macos without mac-package-identifier

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2730/head:pull/2730
$ git checkout pull/2730

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 25, 2021

👋 Welcome back herrick! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 25, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 25, 2021

@andyherrick The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 25, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 25, 2021

Webrevs

@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member

Nice to have runtime packaging implemented on all supported platforms!

@andyherrick andyherrick changed the title JDK-8261839: Error creating runtime package on macos without mac-pack… JDK-8261839: Error creating runtime package on macos without mac-package-identifier Feb 26, 2021
Copy link
Member

@azuev-java azuev-java left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 1, 2021

@andyherrick This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8261839: Error creating runtime package on macos without mac-package-identifier

Reviewed-by: asemenyuk, almatvee, kizune

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 52 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4c9adce: 8262379: Add regression test for JDK-8257746
  • 6baecf3: 8259937: guarantee(loc != NULL) failed: missing saved register with native invoker
  • c569f1d: 8262085: Hovering Metal HTML Tooltips in different windows cause IllegalArgExc on Linux
  • 75bf106: 8262028: Make InstanceKlass::implementor return InstanceKlass
  • fe8e370: 8262188: Add test to verify trace page sizes logging on Linux
  • 0a7fff4: 8261636: The test mapping in hugetlbfs_sanity_check should consider LargePageSizeInBytes
  • 702ca62: 8262185: G1: Prune collection set candidates early
  • 8bc8542: 8262195: Harden tests that use the HostsFileNameService (jdk.net.hosts.file property)
  • 20c93b3: 8261914: IfNode::fold_compares_helper faces non-canonicalized bool when running JRuby JSON workload
  • ddd550a: 8261308: C2: assert(inner->is_valid_counted_loop(T_INT) && inner->is_strip_mined()) failed: OuterStripMinedLoop should have been removed
  • ... and 42 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/2c99bad082c672b2f1b4dc7792c213b2e9076f57...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 1, 2021
@andyherrick
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 1, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 1, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 1, 2021

@andyherrick Since your change was applied there have been 53 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 682e120: 8262497: Delete unused utility methods in ICC_Profile class
  • 4c9adce: 8262379: Add regression test for JDK-8257746
  • 6baecf3: 8259937: guarantee(loc != NULL) failed: missing saved register with native invoker
  • c569f1d: 8262085: Hovering Metal HTML Tooltips in different windows cause IllegalArgExc on Linux
  • 75bf106: 8262028: Make InstanceKlass::implementor return InstanceKlass
  • fe8e370: 8262188: Add test to verify trace page sizes logging on Linux
  • 0a7fff4: 8261636: The test mapping in hugetlbfs_sanity_check should consider LargePageSizeInBytes
  • 702ca62: 8262185: G1: Prune collection set candidates early
  • 8bc8542: 8262195: Harden tests that use the HostsFileNameService (jdk.net.hosts.file property)
  • 20c93b3: 8261914: IfNode::fold_compares_helper faces non-canonicalized bool when running JRuby JSON workload
  • ... and 43 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/2c99bad082c672b2f1b4dc7792c213b2e9076f57...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 642f45f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@andyherrick andyherrick deleted the JDK-8261839 branch March 8, 2021 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants