Skip to content

Conversation

@haimaychao
Copy link
Contributor

@haimaychao haimaychao commented Nov 7, 2025

The DefaultOptions.java test may fail as the current system time is before the signing certificate NotBefore time, when jarsigner tool validates it in CertificateValidity.valid(). Please review the fix in this test to avoid such intermittent timing problem. Thanks.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8371383: Test sun/security/tools/jarsigner/DefaultOptions.java failed due to CertificateNotYetValidException (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28186/head:pull/28186
$ git checkout pull/28186

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28186
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28186/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28186

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28186

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28186.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 7, 2025

👋 Welcome back hchao! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 7, 2025

@haimaychao This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8371383: Test sun/security/tools/jarsigner/DefaultOptions.java failed due to CertificateNotYetValidException

Reviewed-by: weijun

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 206 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the security security-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 7, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 7, 2025

@haimaychao The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 7, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Webrevs

/*
* @test
* @bug 8049834
* @bug 8049834 8371383
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor: This is a test issue, could you please remove the bug id from here, as it only tracks product ones?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed the bug id.


// Add delay to help the signing certificate’s NotBefore time has
// passed and avoid CertificateNotYetValidException.
Thread.sleep(5000);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if it wouldn't be cleaner to add -startdate -1M to the cert gen instead of sleeping in the test. similar to this pr.

What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated code as suggested.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 20, 2025
@haimaychao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Going to push as commit 0972ba6.
Since your change was applied there have been 206 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 21, 2025

@haimaychao Pushed as commit 0972ba6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated security security-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants