Skip to content

Conversation

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Oct 26, 2025

I backport this for parity with 17.0.18-oracle.

Clean backport, but needed to remove platform thread coding.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8364263 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8364263: HttpClient: Improve encapsulation of ProxyServer (Enhancement - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4111/head:pull/4111
$ git checkout pull/4111

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4111
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4111/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4111

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4111

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4111.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 26, 2025

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 26, 2025

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8364263: HttpClient: Improve encapsulation of ProxyServer

Reviewed-by: rschmelter

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@GoeLin GoeLin changed the title Goetz backport 8364263 backport e7cf18212b2dd75b9e068e5bb02e6372e8893954 Oct 26, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title backport e7cf18212b2dd75b9e068e5bb02e6372e8893954 8364263: HttpClient: Improve encapsulation of ProxyServer Oct 26, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 26, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 26, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 26, 2025

Webrevs

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Oct 27, 2025

GHA failure: test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic#id0 failed. Unrelated.

Copy link
Contributor

@schmelter-sap schmelter-sap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Oct 27, 2025
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Oct 27, 2025

GHA failure: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic#id0 failed. Unrelated.
Might be fixed by #4097

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Oct 28, 2025
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Oct 28, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 28, 2025

@GoeLin This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration.

Copy link
Contributor

@schmelter-sap schmelter-sap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Forgot to approve.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 28, 2025
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Oct 28, 2025

Thanks :)

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Oct 28, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Going to push as commit 63406ab.
Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 28, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 28, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 28, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 28, 2025

@GoeLin Pushed as commit 63406ab.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@GoeLin GoeLin deleted the goetz_backport_8364263 branch October 28, 2025 10:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants