Skip to content

8371356: [lworld] 'super' should be rejected in early construction context#1740

Closed
vicente-romero-oracle wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:lworldfrom
vicente-romero-oracle:JDK-8371356
Closed

8371356: [lworld] 'super' should be rejected in early construction context#1740
vicente-romero-oracle wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:lworldfrom
vicente-romero-oracle:JDK-8371356

Conversation

@vicente-romero-oracle
Copy link
Contributor

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle commented Nov 17, 2025

There is a bug in the algo to determine what is kosher and what is not in early construction contexts. The algo was not analyzing any static symbol. But according to the JLS 25 15.11.2 Accessing Superclass Members using super:

It is a compile-time error if a field access expression using the keyword super
occurs in a static context (§8.1.3) or in an early construction context (§8.8.7) of
the current class.

the previous code was checking this only for instance field accesses. The current fix corrects this bug

TIA


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Committer)

Issue

  • JDK-8371356: [lworld] 'super' should be rejected in early construction context (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1740/head:pull/1740
$ git checkout pull/1740

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1740
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1740/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1740

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1740

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1740.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 17, 2025

👋 Welcome back vromero! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into lworld will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 17, 2025

@vicente-romero-oracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8371356: [lworld] 'super' should be rejected in early construction context

Reviewed-by: liach

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the lworld branch:

  • fe178a8: 8364447: [lworld] Save isIdentity in a field of Class
  • 63a6221: 8371897: [lworld] CLONE - VerifyJimage test incorrectly skips all tests when comparing directory structure

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the lworld branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the lworld branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 17, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Webrevs


class Inner9Test extends Medium {
Inner9Test() {
boolean check1 = Inner9Test.super.check;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the test also use Parent.super.check and Medium.super.check?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in those cases javac already fails with:

error: not an enclosing class: ClassName

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I remember the original case provided uses Interface.super.staticField. So it's like we have this code in Medium instead; can we maybe make Inner9Test instead of Medium implement Parent?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I couldn't reproduce the error with the original example in javac, the original example was tested on jshell, but when then the reporter went back to the original java code for which this issue was happening and the case in the JBS was the minimal standalone reproductor for the issue. Dunno what is the interaction with jshell that makes the difference though

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 17, 2025
@vicente-romero-oracle
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Going to push as commit e50f031.
Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the lworld branch:

  • fe178a8: 8364447: [lworld] Save isIdentity in a field of Class
  • 63a6221: 8371897: [lworld] CLONE - VerifyJimage test incorrectly skips all tests when comparing directory structure

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 17, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 17, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 17, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 17, 2025

@vicente-romero-oracle Pushed as commit e50f031.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle deleted the JDK-8371356 branch November 17, 2025 22:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants