feat(workspace): add ports field to WorkspaceConfiguration#60
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA single OpenAPI schema definition for ChangesNetwork Ports Configuration
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@workspace-configuration/openapi.yaml`:
- Around line 87-91: The ports array schema currently allows any integer so
invalid TCP ports (0, negatives, >65535) can be accepted; update the ports ->
items schema to add minimum: 1 and maximum: 65535 and set uniqueItems: true on
the ports array to reject duplicates; modify the existing ports definition (the
ports property and its items schema) to include these constraints so validation
enforces valid TCP port ranges and uniqueness.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 2f35ec97-4c6e-4984-8a25-22167a3c9b50
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
workspace-configuration/openapi.yaml
Allows users to specify a list of TCP port numbers to expose from the workspace, alongside the existing network and environment configuration. Co-Authored-By: Claude Code (claude-sonnet-4-6) <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Philippe Martin <phmartin@redhat.com>
jeffmaury
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM but we also need to plan how to get the local ports once workspace is started or did I miss something (CL API ?)?
Allows users to specify a list of TCP port numbers to expose from the workspace, alongside the existing network and environment configuration.
Related to openkaiden/kdn#385