Skip to content

Conversation

@dwhswenson
Copy link
Member

This should have been added in 0.3.0, with the compiling subpackage. It has been (and probably will be) fine as a transitive dependency from OpenPathSampling. But there's no reason not to do best practices.

See conda-forge/openpathsampling-cli-feedstock#7 (comment)

This should have been added in 0.3.0, with the compiling subpackage.
It has been (and probably will be) fine as a transitive dependency from
OpenPathSampling. But there's no reason to do best practices.
@dwhswenson
Copy link
Member Author

This is ready for review and comment. Without review, I will merge this after at least 12 hours, no sooner than Fri 09 Aug 18:00 GMT (13:00 my local).

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (966a4d6) to head (76a0be1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #85   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          110       110           
  Lines         5422      5422           
=========================================
  Hits          5422      5422           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@sroet sroet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice catch by the analysis. LGTM!

@dwhswenson dwhswenson merged commit e996e00 into openpathsampling:main Aug 9, 2024
@dwhswenson dwhswenson deleted the add-numpy branch August 21, 2024 23:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants