Skip to content

Conversation

@andrross
Copy link
Member

@andrross andrross commented May 1, 2025

The list of supported conditions is correct, but the examples use max_primary_shard_size which is not supported. This change uses max_size in the examples instead.

Related to opensearch-project/OpenSearch#18174

Checklist

  • By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and subject to the Developers Certificate of Origin.
    For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

The list of supported conditions is correct, but the examples use
`max_primary_shard_size` which is not supported. This change uses
`max_size` in the examples instead.

There was also a formatting error on a table.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <andrross@amazon.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 1, 2025

Thank you for submitting your PR. The PR states are In progress (or Draft) -> Tech review -> Doc review -> Editorial review -> Merged.

Before you submit your PR for doc review, make sure the content is technically accurate. If you need help finding a tech reviewer, tag a maintainer.

When you're ready for doc review, tag the assignee of this PR. The doc reviewer may push edits to the PR directly or leave comments and editorial suggestions for you to address (let us know in a comment if you have a preference). The doc reviewer will arrange for an editorial review.

Copy link
Collaborator

@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @andrross! LGTM

@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws merged commit 2082dae into opensearch-project:main May 1, 2025
7 checks passed
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
The list of supported conditions is correct, but the examples use
`max_primary_shard_size` which is not supported. This change uses
`max_size` in the examples instead.

There was also a formatting error on a table.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <andrross@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2082dae)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@andrross andrross deleted the rollover-max-primary-shard-size branch May 1, 2025 21:10
zane-neo pushed a commit to zane-neo/documentation-website that referenced this pull request May 2, 2025
…oject#9805)

The list of supported conditions is correct, but the examples use
`max_primary_shard_size` which is not supported. This change uses
`max_size` in the examples instead.

There was also a formatting error on a table.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <andrross@amazon.com>
KishoreKicha14 pushed a commit to KishoreKicha14/documentation-website that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2025
…oject#9805)

The list of supported conditions is correct, but the examples use
`max_primary_shard_size` which is not supported. This change uses
`max_size` in the examples instead.

There was also a formatting error on a table.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <andrross@amazon.com>
epugh pushed a commit to o19s/documentation-website that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2025
…oject#9805)

The list of supported conditions is correct, but the examples use
`max_primary_shard_size` which is not supported. This change uses
`max_size` in the examples instead.

There was also a formatting error on a table.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <andrross@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Pugh <epugh@opensourceconnections.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants